Lobbyists fundraising appeal. We suggest that the approach be taken that thats not the approach taken but the [inaudible] standard used and instead of listing each individual contributor the date is given so if you do a fundraising event and responsible for 10 people contributing 500 the event shows 5,000 from the lobbyist to the specific candidate. We believe should should be done and effectuates the policy and not over burden the requirements. The real intent of the law is ensure that the public is aware of any possible undue influence that occurs between a lobbyist and an Office Holder or candidate and that will be clearly shown on a report that shows total sum of money maybe more helpful to have the total sum than what each contractor gave and in addition the report will show. What they gave over 100 and which contributor giving to which candidate is shown and [inaudible] on a lobbyist. A lobbyist will have to know each and every person that contributed on their behalf which is a h
That made it wrong and youre unwilling to do anything to correct the situation and theres never anything on this report that indicates you ever will. David pilpel again speaking as an idea. The report is good, comprehensive as usual. I think it would be helpful for the next few months up to the november election to include a category here for public financing. I believe there is only one candidate qualified but i think reporting on payments under the finance program would serve the publics interest and if there is anything else to report on the disclosure for november. I anticipate a lot of activity for. Candidates and ballot measures and heightly contested so if you can provide that in addition to the website and the dashboard with all of that that would be helpful. Thank you very much. All right. Turning to agenda item number eight. Items for future meetings . Commissioners have any items that they would propose for future agenda . Well, i am a newer commissioner so hearing from the
Talk about certain things. I was told the same thing by the president of the arts commission. And the Library Commission and they all knew it wasnt true but they did it anyway. Why . Because they got away with it because they knew it would go to the task force and for some reason you want people to believe that the Sunshine Ordinance Task force is a group that doesnt know what theyre doing and youre more clever than they are because you can find a way there is something they did in some way that made it wrong and youre unwilling to do anything to correct the situation and theres never anything on this report that indicates you ever will. David pilpel again speaking as an idea. The report is good, comprehensive as usual. I think it would be helpful for the next few months up to the november election to include a category here for public financing. I believe there is only one candidate qualified but i think reporting on payments under the finance program would serve the publics interest
Multiple copies of the same communication sent and we would say from the same individual to the same officer constitutes only one contact. Page five line three. The determination what constitutes the practice of law is based on an analysis. And then same page line 13. Let attorney and the ceo. We would add that attorney and the ceo have each made a contact specifying that the contact made a contact as well. I think thats it. With those pardon me . [inaudible] for Public Comment on this issue. I just want to get the motion. Okay. Then we will [inaudible] i will accept the changes. Okay. All right. Now Public Comment on the motion . Sorry about the interruption guys. Good evening. I am jonathan [inaudible] and work at the [inaudible] law firm and hopefully you have in front of you this evening we submitted a letter to you on comment about the proposed regulation and wanted to bring to your attention before a decision or action is taken. I would specifically like to speak to the issue reg
Wanted to bring to your attention before a decision or action is taken. I would specifically like to speak to the issue regarding the actual way that lobbyist fundraising activity would be reported. Right now the recommendation by staff and the proposed regulation states that there should be an itemization of each contributor of over 100 that is given as a result of the lobbyists fundraising appeal. We suggest that the approach be taken that thats not the approach taken but the [inaudible] standard used and instead of listing each individual contributor the date is given so if you do a fundraising event and responsible for 10 people contributing 500 the event shows 5,000 from the lobbyist to the specific candidate. We believe should should be done and effectuates the policy and not over burden the requirements. The real intent of the law is ensure that the public is aware of any possible undue influence that occurs between a lobbyist and an Office Holder or candidate and that will be c