The dr requester prefers a date of august 16th ill note on august of you have 4 drs scheduled and it is equally as business. Opening it up for Public Comment for continuance robin and malinda. Can you hear me commissioner president fong and honorable commissioners im robin the cochair of pacific Avenue Association thank you for allowing me to speak theres an agreement between the project sponsor and myself as august 13th date ill let the project sponsor speak on behalf of himself im pleased we can come to an agreement i want to make one comment if i may ive been the leader or the cochair of the pacific Avenue Neighborhood Association for more than 10 years and i did my very best to represent the entire neighborhood i care deeply about this city and my neighborhood and i care even more deeply about the people that reside and work in that neighborhood we try our best to Work Together to make that a winwin for everyone involved i thank the commission for the augusts 13 date and i thank th
Agree with the sentiments of the activation along valencia street, however, i bore designing in the Commission Meeting and making that requirement is a step towards that thats my stance on how i view the commission i do agriculture with the sentimental law along valencia street one of the things i said was i like this use because it brings a different perspective to the meaning of activation most people think of activation youre going into a to make a long story short into a retail and people think of things that are not retailers are commercial establishment and not park as not active i think that a medical use can be active but the designs here the design changes rather get part of the way but not most of the way to me the real bar the retail space and the waiting room space is are in the same corner so those alone most of storefront on valencia yes, it is maybe you guys tried to make that visible interesting i appreciate but to me, you see people sitting and Walking Around coming in
Okay. Not seeing Public Comment is closed. And commissioner richards. Yes. Question for ms. Conors you sent a great email this morning i couldnt find it we had it would you be able to go over that for us and have the map of the site kind of point out the differences would be helpful. Sure of course. I want to start with the 3 61 turk one the main issues that was submitted at the hearing at the last public hearing there used to be a staircase that was located here now thats brought u brought into the envelope that is a main level set back so the Community Space and ill see so be able to consultant that the Community Space has to be slightly reduced in size some of the differences the 3 61 turk to noted an extra floor inserted at the floor let me pull up on elevation real quick. So the additional floor was added at the lowest level of mid block portion of tush it is a down sloping lot so this is labeled as level zero on the plan so it is able to accommodate some units and floor one was s
Be joined by Scott Sanchez for the Planning Department and Planning Commission and joe duffy that represents the department of building inspection mr. Pacheco please go over the boards meeting guidelines and the phones and other Electronic Devices are prohibited. Out in the hallway. People affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes no rebuttal. To assist the board in the accurate preparation of the Business Card to the clerk. Speaker cards and pens are available on the left side of the podium. The board welcomes your comments. There are Customer Satisfaction forms available. If you have a question about the schedule, speak to the staff after the meeting or call the board office tomorrow mroemdz 78. Dvds are available to purchase directly from sfgovtv. Thank you for your attention. Well conduct our swearing in process. Business card to the clerk. Do. Please note any of the members may speak without taking
Consider the institutional master plan and no need for anything further ill be happy to answer any questions katherine from the conservatory is here. Opening it up for Public Commentcomment. Sue hester this is a way the institutional master plan is supposed to work you youve had them from California College of arts and crafts conservatory and a couple of other institutions relatively painless this one is struggling to build housing in a principle manner on the site right next to the academy of the art what that handout is is the land holding the academy of art is looking to build more youll find 150 they see as their future administrative haurtdz you are headquarters a block from city hall and i submitted comments that have been considered that was before even i know about the plans to do housing on the other side of the 0 lot line you have a responsibility to take the institutional master plan seriously where there is a Housing Demand from the students from the people their meeting it