Happening in the markets. The shanghai had a very good day and machine orders, not particularly strong, jim. May have pressured that mark down as much as 1 . Tenyear note yield on all this news about selling by Central Banks around the world to a certain extent. It is hanging in there 2 . The chinese continue to do some selling. Crude has been much of the story this week when it comes to our equity markets and even the highyield market. It is creeping in there. Thats some new highs. We havent seen edging towards that 50 level in quite some time. Lets get to our road map this morning. It starts with dell and private equity firms silver lake partners. They are in talks to buy data storage link company, emc. I will have details. A strongly worded response to millers rejection of its latest offer. Alibaba is out with a company update. They are launching a site called alibaba defined, trying to clarify whats going on at the company for those that dont know it as well as they would like. It
Party chairmen of the i would find it i would be shocked if the court which is not a necessary and says it has to be total population in this case. They dont need to decide that to resolve this case. They can leave it open. If it becomes a problem they can reach it at some later time. Questions from the press. My question is for hashim. You kept saying voters and suggested [inaudible] arent asking for voters or are they asking for citizen voting age population . The cameras are asking that if you have questions come to the mic. Its not being picked up. Im sorry. I will mumble it now. You kept saying voters and suggested, for example, that prisons in rural areas would not be counted because they are felons. But are they asking for voters that are literally eligible to vote or of asking for citizen age voting population . Results are different. So the brief is a little come the plaintiffs a brief vessel agnostic about. As i read it there focus on eligible voters. There are a lot of diffe
Shortly that showed that mr. Scy the Police Officer was attempting to flee, and frankly, flee and not quick manner that was shot in the back and shot multiple times. It was a tragedy. It was a horrific incident in our state. Before that happened, we would often here that that is not what happened in South Carolina. And maybe i think that many people said to themselves, maybe that happened not to people like us. The ones that video came out there were many new people sitting at the table to discuss the need for body cameras. He spoke about thomas and jesus and thomaston believe until he put his finger in the wound i would encourage you to look at that speech if you want to you to bid on look at it sometime. He did not speak very often from the floor. Butfloor. But the bill passed. Real change occurred in South Carolina command we now have funded body cameras. I want you to flash back with me to 2014. I was the democratic candidate for governor in a different difficult year. In the fall
The National Review previewed high cases the court will consider this year. Ramesh ponnuru moderates this hour and 15 minute discussion. From the washington, d. C. Center. The National Review and the Pacific Legal foundation is honored to welcome you here today with the hurricane coverage and the to hundreds of thousands of people across the country who are tuning in by cspan. We would also like to thank jones day for this nice roof and Staff Assistance to for putting this together. As for plf, our interest in the Supreme Court mirrors brief attention. We will have as many as eight petitions pending before the justice involving cases that we have filled and i think that is probably the most of any Public Interest legal organization. We have seven straight wins in the Supreme Court. So we hope to extend that string of victories this term. And finally, scoutus blog has noted we are the most famous brief filers for the court. Our guest will talk about the most important Supreme Court case
Blocks we need. Here is what the challengers are saying. They are saying the Voting Rights justification says section five is no longer in effect and you should not be able to defend the deviations that have a pattern of difference between the majority districts based on the statues that are no longer enforceable. If that argument is accepted there is a lot more maps around the country subject to challenge. The other argument is that is a sham, it was done for partisan reasons, contrary to the finding and fact of the District Court, and that is an interesting argument in addition to the fact it defies the ruling of the District Court in terms of the facts. The amount of partisanship is so small it is tiny compared to maps that have been upheld by the Supreme Court in previous cases. What you have here is an effort to use these minor deviations in populations to ratchet up the level of scrutiny in the drawing of district maps to the point where you would have a double standard. Some map