Happen. But they also provided a lot of verbal and we had a lot of notes, feedback. Right now were going through all of that information and were analyzing what are the main concerns, and what do people want to preserve about what they like about the neighborhood as it exists today. So, our hope is to finish analyzing the information and then we go back to the community and have some proposals how to address what they would like to see addressed. We stuck to cleanliness, safety, noise, because the transportation issues, peter all bert had a big workshop on the week before. So we didnt focus as much on Public Transportation and traffic, although we did touch on where Traffic Control might be located and needed. So, were in the process. We havent come up with the answers yet, but we are going to and work with the community on some strategies to address the concerns that youre talking about, cleanliness and safety and impacts of different large events happening in the neighborhood. So, if
And by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. Thank you. [ prologue from west side story playing ] jerry is the only genius ive ever met, my definition of genius being endless invention. He was very, very particular and that was both frightening and thrilling. If you do what Jerome Robbins tells you to do, youre gonna be just fine. People forget about him as a performer. He was a wonderful performer. When he was on sure ground he was fine. When he was on less sure ground or unable to express himself he was a terror. He insulted me many times. He was an absolute doll. Great artists are not great saints. Its two jobs. [ prologue from west side story continues ] good evening. Im ed murrow. The name of the program is person to person. Tonight well be visiting first with Jerome Robbins, the outstanding director choreographer in the American Theater today. At the age of 40 he can look back on an almost unbroken string of broadway and ballet hits during, oh the past 15 years
I can perform, i can choreograph, i can assist you. And i got a note back saying come on. [ laughs ] jerry was making money hand over fist and balanchine had although he had done good work on broadway had never been terribly successful, the way jerry was being. I mean, jerry was really the king of broadway. Jerry was connected to a different audience and had a popular point of view that he felt would be useful. And remember in those days new York City Ballet was considered very, very elite. It was high tone. Sometimes on a matinee thered be more dancers onstage than in the audience and we were like 40 people in the company. The whole idea of him choosing to work with balanchine, somebody whom he clearly admired and somebody whom he thought was better than him, that said a lot about jerry. Mikhail baryshnikov he made this really extraordinary choice and he changed his life. He just admired a man who sometimes treated him roughly, too, you know, in front of a lot of people, you know. But
Pedestrian crossing signals. And bulbs out have a great benefit for people with disabilities and thats one of those principles in universal design where it benefits safety and functionality. Last question. Quickly, if i can add to that caltrans bulb out. And we heard about concerns for high hits when pedestrians are standing on bulbs outs and large vehicles clipping pedestrians on the upper half of their bodies when they stand there and that high hit issue is another. And before that, david. I didnt see ellens slide of the widen bulb out but heard chuckles about turning the space to the people in the street. And you have to remember that the bulb out serves a lot of functions and if you forget the functions, then its useless. And its a difficult and they serve interesting and vital functions to the space and they provide open space. And can you do them to the point that you just wonder why you bothd bothered to put them in and we have to fight that tendences. I have two questions, what
Objectives, i respectfully submit that i think that this is yet another example of how some of these agencies that were talking about are disconnected from the reality of whats out there in our communities and specifically i think this is yet another example of the rec and Park Department not really understanding what its priorities should be and, quite frankly, the fact that the comment that was made by supervisor breed and i appreciate the comment i think that the fact that there is no specific mandate or specific requirement doesnt leave a lot of confidence given how rec and park has approached a number of issues over the last couple of years. The idea that we would be spending so much time and energy trying to remove trees from San Francisco is something that i have yet to understand. I dont understand how it is that an agency decide that this is what its priorities should be, and there are a number of issues that should be rayed with respect to this document, including the equity