claim was not my concern and i never really went there. why wasn t the check just coming from somewhere else? what was your understanding? what was the frustration from your perspective? this was a period of time after the election but before the inauguration that there w was it was once he realized he wasn t going to washington and he was dispondent. to a lawyer he was doing a deal with, he talked about whether or not he was going to go work in the white house? yes. he says the opposite. he says he never wanted to go to washington. he couldn t go to washington. that he had to convince the president, i know you need me. have to stay on the outside because we won t have the same privileged relationship if we go
maybe jonathan s right and there s some other piece of evidence they re trying to protect. if there was a strategy point that came out of that and i m not con advised there w convi there was one at 9:00 at night on television. to point out there are other people on television at the same time as rudy giuliani. they were completely coherent. so i don t know why like we re half joking but we re half serious. maybe he had a heavy meal and was kind of no, we re talking whether or not he was it slows him downs are slurs yours words. no. i know if i have, mika, a big meal late at night before going on, my words slur and my eyes bulge. things you cannot believe ever. this is unprecedented.
and i rent a car to use in the bank robbery, i get a gun, i drive to the bank but i see the guards outside and i abandon my plans, guess what? i m guilty of attempted bank robbery. again, the only thing that roger stone adds to the dialogue is really carbon dioxide. beyond that, there is really no value to anything he says. we have to wait and see what bob mueller has. ben, you told the washington post, quote, that unless mueller has tape recordings of phone calls, what would would prove? so if mueller wants to prove these discussions indeed took place, how does he go about doing that if he does not have tape recordings? he does it through witnesses, and i m not sure whether there were tape recordings, but there w was. but we also know there are
reporter: there w there was a building here, i promise. reporter: as michael shows me what used to be his restaurant, it s obvious the pain is still fresh. an open kitchen where everybody could see what was going on. reporter: it s gone. hal summers was general manager. he s lost his job and his home. both men could have wallowed in self-pity and left town. instead they decided to help the only way they could. they cooked. in a church parking lot amidst of roar of generators and grill, they began feeding first responds are and residents three times a day, seven days a week, for free. they call it camp happy tummies. fueled by donations, it provides
it s twitter or facebook or other outlets like this, there w is no other place. if you can t talk on twitter, or facebook or what have you, what are you supposed to do? tucker: once they shut you down, people they disagree with, the debate doesn t happen. that seems to be the point. tucker: i ask this question everyday. what you think conservatives in the congress don t see thisha as the mortal threat to debate and speech that it is? i think some are starting to see it, but maybe not enough yet. chairman bob goodlatte had a hearing on this over the summer specifically addressed this issue that social media were trying to skew political debate and prevent certain voices from being heard, but it hasn t become a high enough priority issue. tucker: we are going to try to change that. thanks very much for coming on. thank you. tucker: we showed you in this program how google employees worked to help get hillary clinton elected and how