the thing that we need to acknowledge. tucker: so how racist is donald trump?? so racist that when he criticizes a group of political? extremists comprised almost entirely of upper-middle-class white kids, that s racist too. huh? yeah, because the white kids wear black clothing, get it? black clothing. which of course trump hates because the clothing is black, racism again. let s be clear also about what s going on here. the theme here is, i m donald trump and i will protect you from the scary black people. antifa is widely perceived as an african-american organization. this is about black versus white. this is about donald trump s appeal to racism. tucker: in yet another cable television appearance, he called donald trump racist for criticizing elizabeth warren, who, like those antifa kids, is also white, but also doesn t want to admit it. w pretty funny. someday we will wake up from all
at the ftc hearings and we found that one of one-third of the experts testifying have ties to google. they work for law firms that google has hired or they have been paid by google directly to write papers. tucker: they have financial ties? had they disclosed this? that s the problem. none of the people that we found who had financial ties to google have disclosed those financial ties. they will disclose that they are a part of a nonprofit thatfi google has funded or that they are part of a law firm that google has hired to do legal work. so the ftc should be concernedle about whether these people are providing independent, unbiasedo testimony. tucker: if i m working for marlboro and i m called to testify on whether smoking causes cancer, shouldn t i say that i have taken money from the cigarette company? that s exactly right. all these other industries are much better at disclosing this information. for some reason the tech industry is very bad att disclosure. tucker: wouldn
a staffer in senator mcconnell s office, a senior staffer saw this, thought it sounded weird, went back and checked and alerted the fact-checkers and includingwe the washington post and they give harris four pinocchios. but a weird thing is happening. it s almost as if that s a badge of honor. that s not something that i i admire, but watch her. i think that she is not someone to be counted out. tucker: it s scary. thank you very much for that analysis. you re welcome, have a good night. tucker: the creepy porn lawyer refuses to come on the show. we ve asked him many times, but he s still talking on other channels. we will show you what he said. it really is the creepiest ever. stay tuned for that. i can t believe it. that everything sticks to stefon diggs s hands? no, i can t believe how easy it was to save hundreds of dollars on my car insurance with geico. cool, huh? yeah.
the rules aren t explicit. you don t have to exactly disclose who you are working for, but the ftc maybe should look into adopting rules that require all of its people tucker: this raises, i think, a really interesting question that s been bothering me for over a year as we ve been doing the story again and again. why is nobody else talking about this? i think that s a really good question. tucker: could it be that a lot of people in washington have been paid off? i m starting to think that.e we ve been looking into google for a year ando during the obama administration google had a meeting in the white house once a week. google hired 250 former of the obama administration to work company. tucker: 250? they have huge and obvious ties. that s certainly a problem why nobody wants to look into them. there are state attorneys general who want to look into them but it s hard to get traction in d.c. tucker: so many employees and none of them would come on our show. you woul
instead become all about grievance, a group and identity politics and where that leads, i certainly could not discern. tucker: never leads to a good place. lou dobbs, thank you very much for that analysis. i appreciate it. good to be with you. tucker: thanks very much for coming on, robert. this is a question i ve been mulling, well, since last june. whenever there s a shooting, a mass shooting, the left predictably calls for gun control. i can t remember a single casese where they didn t, except when steve scalise was shot. i didn t hear anybody on the left call for gun control in the wake of that. the call for gun control is because of the continuous and epidemic levels of both gun violence in america.a. i m a pro-second amendment person. i own way more guns than you own, tucker.