clean, this is how it went down architects of this law. and rather than just coming clean, this is how it went down architects of this law. and rather than just coming clean, this is how it went down, there w it was blaming someone else including fox. there was a recent poll that said fox news is the most trusted source when it costs to information on the health care law. in the face of that, he says it s all fox news fault. and i told you why, because it s not about obama care, it s about liberalism in general. this is his signature deal. but this doctor, to be fair to him, he didn t have anything to do with the rollout of the computer or anything. he s the big picture let s give health care to everybody guy. that s right. and he did say that he does believe they should have appointed a ceo to oversee health care and they didn t do it. yes, they did. kathleen sebelius. she s not the ceo. it s basically the medicare people running this.
senators that would give the president the authority to go to war. weren t half-truths is what we were being told by the intelligence community. we subsequently found out that a lot of that information was not accurate and that is very unfortunate but that s the way it unfolded. was he wrong on iraq? with respect to what? with respect to what he ultimately called a huge foreign policy blunder? he that s his characterization and if people want to challenge his characterization, they will have that opportunity. in your judgment, was he wrong on iraq? i would not have called it that h i would have said i think the president had more than sufficient basis to believe there were weapons of mass destruction that were a danger to the world and possibility of those weapons going to terrorists. and so, he undertook military action. i think that was the correct thing to do and it was well supported by the intelligence. i think we did not execute the operation well. once baghdad fell
we subsequently found out that a lot of that information was not accurate and that is very unfortunate but that s the way it unfolded. was he wrong on iraq? with respect to what? with respect to what he ultimately called a huge foreign policy blunder? he that s his characterization and if people want to challenge his characterization, they will have that opportunity. in your judgment, was he wrong on iraq? i would not have called it that h i would have said i think the president had more than sufficient basis to believe there were weapons of mass destruction that were a danger to the world and possibility of those weapons going to terrorists. and so, he undertook military action. i think that was the correct thing to do and it was well supported by the intelligence. i think we did not execute the operation well. once baghdad fell. there w once baghdad fell, was a feeling that was the end of it. it was not. it was just the beginning for it. he was controversial for co
via telephone. we don t yet. you heard, i think there w was the president didn t just decide to say, hey, it s critical we get these folks confirmed, we don t want to have gap in foreign policy. that wasn t just a throw away line, as you know, that was because they re getting concerned this was not proceeding on as speedy a track they would like to see when it comes to getting the confirmation hearing set up and getting this moving forward. i have a feeling we may be i don t know if chuck hagel is going to be in person listening to the president s state of the union, put it that way. i don t know if it gets done by then. he clearly has a problem, hagel does on the right with republicans, and there was talk potentially on the left with gay rights supporters. does that seem to you have been put to rest or still a potential threat for him? i don t think that s much of a potential threat. i think he probably this mice
wer lloit.8 t llio we dn t ve tooubl i tio dwe dt bled ioblecau i dedf i polical asontoau pdero spialnterts o li bl hon prides . sp golto serp o bhes go s i thirade cerinlyad impt on i hat. youhiook deerly e pas ge ompont. ou k naft and eattas o ahinarade ft ndthat ireasurt anadeefic . at ias th shied js ou o untr ic you d i a thhi jou tog oher hat. tr u i a bil loo i makina pot thog your an t dagret. wi nd nilodyoo m winchin pothou t dre c.wi yea ny a win befe/11, we c were ea a vrantef1,e re vationt d wepent half wtioe wental endow. w hav t g bac d. t re.av t gouacnow,heresometng tohat t you. s nd ere w,reets. tot weou savepent te llio of we dollsennt psuin t wios thaf ve n mes ll pin wha saf . n m ill:ine. t al socl prramshat af ha bee l:e.