studied active shooters from i believe 2008 to 2013 no sorry 2000 to 2013. i think you studied 160 of them. what can you glean from the facts we know at this hour about this one. boy i don t know. this is a tough panel you ve got tonight. so they re on fire. so i have to be careful what i say. but they you know what we what we ve learned so far. is that the that we have exactly what we see a lot of situations exactly what occurs in a lot of situations. you ve got an individual who has some real or perceived grievance and they formulate this plan and they buy the equipment. they need to execute it. they do the surveillance and purchase their ammunition and plot their way out so that they can leave their message and send a message for whatever that is, and we ll see what that is, but it will be pretty common what we see in a lot of times and very troubled person, right? who has, who wants to leave their mark and say something when maybe they don t feel like they had an opportun
it works, why are we sitting here saying there s nothing we can do? absolutely there is something we can do these elected officials that are protecting gun bob protecting all these. these winds that are pro guns to the point in which does not responsibility and accountability being used as the center of the conversation, but rather access is the center of the conversation. access shouldn t be the end of the conversation. it wasn t in the constitution. what does it say? regulated militia regulated who was regulating? what if you go back and look to the forefathers? it was the government. it wasn t individuals regulating themselves somehow, some way the n r a and those who are misusing the second amendment in order to have done proliferation have taken what we know that the forefathers met and bastardized their intent in order to allow this gun manufacturing continue and have all this money that s invest investing in the gun lobby. that s what it is leading cause of death now for childre