what he s been doing now is zelenskyy created a foreign region and so putin is creating a foreign legion of people who he s paying for, like mercenaries. zelenskyy s on tv showing this sort of churchillian cool and putin is trying to rally the same thing but forcing people to show up as a publicity stunt. it s pathetic, and zelenskyy and others will dig into that. they ll exploit this. it looks like an elephant ballerina. it doesn t work well. and so it s really playing against his long-term interests whether he knows it or not. he s not from this information age era. it is so true when you read some of the tweets zelenskyy is quick to get out there and help people respond to them. i want to turn back the clock. when you think back to 2016, russia used disinformation and memes on social media to stoke some of the divisions among americans, and now it appears, you know, they cannot win the pr
has that ever worked before? it doesn t work well. first of all, it s a very old statute they re relying on written back in 1857. the language for contempt or the action is a willful default. makes a willful default. isn t clear even what that means. particularly in bannon s situation, he s acting on the advice of counsel. i think this stuff they ll have to debate in the house and committee as to whether this raises to the level of contempt, but i think that s what they want to do. i don t know that it will stick in the department of justice, which has clearly the option as to whether they ll take it to a grand jury or not. so they ll opine on that before they take further action. john, in your mind, is there anything that could compel bannon to cooperate at this point? there sure is. as we talked about before. i don t understand where the house of representatives has not gotten it own rules in order,
have the personnel to really inves investigate? have they got a systematic process of isolating what they call the satellite witnesses, people who might have known or worked with some of the key figures and get them in and, you know, we should be hopeful about that, but it s got to be aggressive and systematic. yeah, i mean, john, you and i have talked about this before, the house select committee says they ll move swift to hold bannon in criminal contempt, but has that ever worked before? it doesn t work well. first of all, it s a very old statute they re relying on, written back in 1857. the language for contempt, or the action is a willful default, makes a willful default. it isn t even clear what that means. and particularly in bannon s situation, he s acting on the
typically gets because of school choice. so don t get between a parent and their children. it doesn t work well. anita: when it comes to the whole issues, the governor s race, the gubernatorial candidate, the candidate has really seized on the issue. in fact, he s launched a parent s matter initiative rallying parents across the state and now he is getting national attention. used within striking distance of the much more well-known terry mcauliffe, let s bring that up if we can. a brand-new fox news poll on that. terry mcauliffe, 51%, 46%, 3% undecided. so it really does seem like parents are paying attention to this issue. you re exactly right and that s why it s so smart. within 24 hours of making that comment, he weaponized into an ad but what is interesting here is the way the white house is
time now for one more thing. some workout tips. jesse s work out. wow. that s real. what is it, 70 pounds? i m just warming up with those buddies. so workout at the gym. do not work out at the office, all right? have you seen these exercise balls? world estate please. people sit on them at their des desk. okay. tried to do a little, you know see how it works. it doesn t work well, people are falling off these things all over at fox news. they were unsafe and i don t like them. so let s get rid of them. workout at the gym, not at the office. i smell a lawsuit. against me? i apologize.