Anderson Cooper takes viewers beyond the headlines with indepth reporting and investigations. Anderson Cooper takes viewers beyond the headlines with indepth reporting and investigations. Anderson Cooper takes viewers beyond the headlines with indepth reporting and investigations. Anderson Cooper takes viewers beyond the headlines with indepth reporting and investigations. Because the email said they were talking about a sealed indictment in a Russian Court about Hillary Clinton. Sealed indictments have been released in the past during campaigns. As you recall in 2004, there was a State Senator from illinois. He was a democrat. He was running against a republican who had a lot of money, and his so you dont see anything sleazy about the meeting . No. No. Do you think Rudy Giuliani is doing a good job representing the president in the Public Sphere . Yes. Because it seems to be hes made contradictly statements, confusing statements. Do you think thats part of his job to sort of muddy the
Anderson Cooper takes viewers beyond the headlines with indepth reporting and investigations. Thats what Rudy Giuliani said today. He wasnt arguing about that statement from Michael Cohen, who is alleging that President Trump did know about that meeting before it occurred. Rudy giuliani only said that he could state for the record that President Trump did not attend that meeting with those russian officials, which is not something that was in question in the first place. It was whether or not President Trump knew about it, which is something that his aides and President Trump himself have denied for months now, including that President Trump said he just found out about it in july of 2017, a year after it happened. And donald trump jr. Testified in front of lawmakers that his father did not know about it before. So it would be increasingly problematic. That is the question now, anderson. It is essentially the president s word versus Michael Cohens. But the white house does not seem to
anybody and he had me thoroughly confused. i think when he was talking about collusion, is it a crime or not, he almost appeared like a law professor. that s not where we are in the realm of law. this is about a political kangaroo court that the swamp is operating and we need to approach it and fight it like a political fight. this is a political cage match. this isn t about criminal law. so i think to me, he confused the issue there, and we need to continue to telegraph what the president has for many, many months. no collusion. and if there s no collusion, then they don t have a political case to usurp what we did in 2016. bakari, is that what it boils down to, to no collusion? again, giuliani today seemed to move the goal post saying, well, collusion is not a crime. so indicating, well, if there was collusion, it s not a crime. no, and i don t know what theoretical law is. somebody s going to have to explain that to me. i will tell you there are two tracks the white house is on