governing required more than fame. he started to realize putin is more intransigent. and also realized as a democratic elected president, he is accountable and has to pay attention to what ukrainians society wants. it becomes clear that ukrainian society does not want to concede too much ground to putin. there were people around zelenskyy who made huge his mistakes in dealing with putin. putin of the not interested in and reasonable resolution. zelenskyy made concessions to putin, but putin didn t reaction to them. he demanded more and more.
governing required more than fame. he started to realize putin is more intransigent. and also realized as a democratic elected president, he is accountable and has to pay attention to what ukrainians society wants. it becomes clear that ukrainian society does not want to concede too much ground to putin. there were people around zelenskyy who made huge his mistakes in dealing with putin. putin of the not interested in and reasonable resolution. zelenskyy made concessions to putin, but putin didn t reaction to them.
one of them being dance casino last night, attorney general merrick garland do your job, it s quite a striking moment. what did you mean by that? this is not the first time that the committee s come together, and referred contempt charges, it s been about three months since we are for those charges relative to mark meadows. you know, there is a constitutional duty to appear before a subpoena in congress. and, mr. meadows has claimed executive privilege, and all these other things, as has dan scavino another s. the truth is, there s a process for that. we have to come before the committee, you have to legitimately lay out those items that they believe are covered by privilege. and the committee will consider those things one by one. but just not appearing, and just essentially rejecting, or ignoring a subpoena from congress, it s against the law. that s why we were for contempt arduous, the department of justice did move for bannon, but they ve been intransigent, they haven t moved ye
attention to the prosecutor during the closing argument. all of these are subjective and intransigent problem that judges could be allowed to do, but send clear messages to the jury about their feelings about the case. i think they damaged and hurt the prosecution s ability to put in a fair case. separate from the fact that i think that the prosecution had a tough case to begin with. and this is before we even start talking about that whole tumbler thing, that they allowed the defendant to pick and choose from. i ve never seen interactions like that from someone that has been charged with murder, interacting with the judge and his staff in the middle of a trial. i just there s so many things that were here i don t think we can discount the influence or the presence of the judge s study or approach and how he executed this trial with this prosecution and with this case. as always, to all of you, if you want to jump in because you hear something you want to talk about, let me know.
everything to everyone all of the time. it s scary stuff. so, nina, this brings up a whole new set of questions. facebook has identified what the problem is. facebook has the ability to fix it. facebook as a feature has decided not to fix it because it is a profitable feature for them. what responsibility does facebook have for the rest of us and whose responsibility is it to make sure that facebook is actually responsible because no one, everybody s researched it and no one s done anything about it. yeah. i think this has been a really frustrating time for people like me who have been researching these problems and a lot of things that are coming out in the facebook papers are things i ve written about for years and there are a group of us who have been sounding the alarm and it s time for all of us to scrape our jobs up off the floor and get to work and not only facebook who has been intransigent in fixing its own problem, but congress through its own partisanship has