onset. how do you do this as a lawyer yourself, what do you do when the other side is refuse tog acknowledge the truth sfl zbr i ll show you with the visual aid. we have the whole report. we don t claim to have read it all because it is this thick. hundreds of pages and we re going through it as team work as you ve been going through it with our colleagues and experts. one thing that jumps out to me in what we re actually learning here, is this is a two pronged attack. many said will it be a three or four. one, the misconduct alleged against donald trump and two, the obstruction. i would note the obstruction is not in doubt at all because the president has said that he won t participate with a fair process. he s attack ed the the process, but everyone knows he s not participating. so the last hundred pages of this go over that. the first 140 pages or so go through what we learned in the hearings with new evidence basically laying out the case
sbel where she knows committee report we re just all of us going through it as fast as we can. the intelligence committee held back a lot of what it had from those hearings as it was trying to go through the witnesses and trying to get information from them, but also holding back some of what it had. giuliani is all over the place here and obviously at the center. what we heard from those witnesses in the intelligence committee hearings was that if the wanted them to work through rudy giuliani. and here according to this report was running the whole operation. the other thing that s important to remember, is that mulvaney is also current ly the director of the office of management and budget. really good point. he s not running that office at the moment, but everybody in the political office over there was at the time mick mulvaney s
clearly did something wrong. i mean and not just wrong. i mean grievously wrong. he tried to cheat in the 2020 election. he tried to get a leg up by getting another government to go and get dirt on his chief political rival, joe biden. that is something and this is why the wrote the book. from the standpoint of the founders, there wasn t a better example of an impeachable offense, a high crime and misdemeanor, than this. on wednesday morning, with all the kind of momentum that came from the intelligence committee hearings, we ll be in this studio. 10:00 a.m. we will go on the air for the opening gavel of the house judiciary committee. and no disrespect to legal academyishens. we will hear from four legal academicians. if not necessarily tv-forward, how traditional a start is this in a hearing like this?
grievously wrong. he tried to cheat in the 2020 election. he tried to get a leg up by getting another government to go and get dirt on his chief political rival, joe biden. that is something this is why i wrote the book from the standpoint of the founders. there one or two a better example of a high crime and misdemeanor than this. on wednesday morning with all the kind of momentum that came from the intelligence committee hearings, we ll be in the studio, 10:00 a.m. we will go on the air for the opening gavel of the house judiciary committee. and no disrespect to legal admissions, we will hear from four legal adem missions, if not necessarily tv forward how traditional a start is this in a hearing like this? very traditional, brian.
in the judiciary committee. have you made up your mind after the intelligence committee hearings on whether you will note yes or no or impeachment at this point? do you have any remaining questions? no, i really don t. this has been so first let me jump to the conclusion first. yes, i will vote for impeachment. there s simply no doubt in this case. and for me it really began as kind of like that old detective show columbo where you know the result at the beginning of the show and then the rest of the show was just filling in the details. that s the case right here because the white house summary of the phone call with zelensky was the smoking gun and then all of the hearings and depositions have been about what led up to that and the months and months of the shakedown that was going on and how many people were involved in it. okay. now we have ambassador sondland even testifying and using the term quid pro quo. so, yes, there is more than