what really worries me is the damage being done for all of us, to all of us. john podesta mentioned the tail pipe emissions, rolling that standard back. it makes no sense from a financial point of view because most of the auto companies have already planned for that they ve already done it. they ve already done it. a lot of the utilities are encouraging people to move to electric cars. but we know that studies show that some 300,000 people a year in this country die from dirty airborne-related causes. do you really want to make that worse? the agency is about protecting public health and the environment. i m all for taking a look at regulations, there are some that have outlived their usefulness, new technology has superseded the kind of things that were required, but this is mindless. anything that had anything to do with barack obama, it s gone, good, bad, indifferent, we don t care. it just going to do real damage down the line. swhat s so troub.
encouraging people to move to electric cars. but we know that he studies show that some 300,000 people a year in this country die from dirty airborne related causes. do you really want to make that worse? it just makes the agency is about protecting public health and the environment. and i m all for take a look at regulations. there s some that have outlived usefulness. new technology has superseded the kinds of things required. this is mindless. anything that had anything to do with barack obama, it s gone. good, bad, indifferent. we don t care. it s going to do real damage down the line. that s so troubling. > should pruitt have to go? well, i don t know who he would come in his place. that s the only trouble. he s certainly doing what the president wants him to do. no question about that. he would have gone long since because there have been enough stories with the travel and all sorts of stuff. he s not the energy lobbyist and yet acted like that on many occasions.
that dechl requires more investigation, definitely. if it was as serious as shpeople would have us believe before the election, why wasn t the obama administration doing more? and certainly, they done more after the election if they had the additional information. this is what causes the american people to mistrust politicians in washington, and their institutions of government. these arguments are so political, so partisan, and it s why i ve come to the reluctant conclusion the only way we ll restore public trust with respect to the russia allegations, the clinton e-mail investigation, the clinton foundation, is basically just make public almost all of what the committees have collected and the testimony. i don t like that idea but otherwise how are the american people to judge in you have to put the evidence in front of them, good, bad or indifferent, and let them make up their minds. not listen to the shrill
moved overseas to the middle east. envoy representing the crown prince united arab emirates evidently is becoming a state s witness for robert mueller. in the past three weeks, brian, mueller got three cash cows so to speak. rick gates, sam nunberg and now this guy george narrowed. nonader. gates and nunberg coming out of the blue cooperating with mueller telling them whatever they know good, bad, indifferent. candidly the eau thing is new to me. apparently nader, george nader not ralph some kind of conduit between the campaign and uae. no crime unless, unless the campaign accepted something of value. that s the language in the statute. something of value could be a piece of paper u could be cash. could be electronic data from a foreign national or foreign government. whether that happened or not, i don t know. brian: we will see where this goes. lisa: and whether they lead to collusion or not is also
the average person in america, why won t that happen up here? and everybody throws the money in. it s because this money here or support money there. it s really because they have the network and facility and the resources to go after people and say this is what this person believes. this is what they re going to do to you. right, wrong or indifferent. when you talk about fake news, this is truly fake news. when someone s trying to do something responsibly and an organization turns it around to thinking they re going to take away your rights, that s what they re concerned about. it takes a tremendous amount of resources to fight that. so some people say rather than fighting it, i ll just kind of let it go, not do anything. that s what you re seeing. and then inaction is what really upsets people such as yourself, stephanie, and everyone else. we ve got to have people brave enough to say listen, public service is public service. it s not self-serving. the worst thing that can happen to