this evidence. i think waiting for the pivot may be a lost cause. hang on. we re so gullible. and he gave the speech to congress and everybody said, he made the pivot, and then two days later those who said that speech was out of character and indifferent, that s very much true. dr. ben carson said stuff that made news, and he was comparing slavery to immigration. it what america is about. a land of dreams and opportunity. there were other immigrants that came here in the bottom of slave ships and worked longer and harder for less, but they, too, had a dream. so he didn t clarify that one shouldn t compare slavery to immigration necessarily, and does it get filed under stuff
thank you. neil: very good having you, sonya. thank you very much. these protests going on around the country today. we ll keep an eye on all of that, the good, the bad and the indifferent. the president being criticized for hitting the campaign trail already. wait a minute. didn t his predecessor do the exact thing and even sooner? i accept i don t race down
middle-class, i bet at some point the democrats will do an autopsy, what specific conclusions would you encourage them to reach? let s look at what they did in 2016, they nominated a candidate who was a career politician, who is extremely rich and perceived as being out of touch and indifferent to the needs of ordinary americans. she spouted talking points and focus group messaging and i think they need fresh voices. to begin with, look at what they did after this debacle in 2016. they renominated as their minority leader of the house, nancy pelosi, the minority leader since 2002 and then made chuck schumer the top democrat in washington even though he spent his career serving wall street. we need fresh voices. people who are not petrified of their own shadow, who do not apologize for telling the truth.
election, if a bunch of smart democrats cap to gather to get the autopsy, what specific inclusions would you encourage them to reach? let s look at what they did in 2016, they nominated a candidate who was a career politician, who is extremely rich and perceived as being out of touch and indifferent to the needs of ordinary americans. she spouted talking points and focus-proved messaging and i think they need fresh voices. to begin with, look at what they did after this debacle in 2016. they renominated as their minority leader of the house, nancy pelosi, the minority leader since 2002 and then made chuck schumer the top democrat in washington even though he spent his career serving wall street. we need fresh voices. people who are not petrified of their own shadow, who do not apologize for telling the trutho not silicon valley and donor class and corporations but people who actually vote, where
that this president can deal ably with any issue. on a controversial immigration ban executive order part of the problem with that was that was done in such a poorly designed way and created such confusion and chaos that it really sparked this massive protest movement and people might have supported it. you do know that they admit poor execution on that. robert, you were shaking your head on this. i know from firsthand experience with president trump before he was president trump that he likes press. whether it s bad or indifferent, just as long as you spell the name right. well, the reality is two things. he is the communications director. he s pretty good at driving his own message, we all know that. the reason i was shaking my head, let me make a prediction here. bob woodward will probably issue another book. his 16th or 17th on the in fighting in the white house. he did this with the obama administration. he did this with the bush 43/41.