don t have any real fear that eastman is going to be convicted in the end. it s going to be a long, painful expensive process if they indict him. i hope they don t. by the way, we are early next week john burr ma am, who is the chief counsel, he brought me into the case and i are sending a memorandum to the department of justice arguing, explaining in law why this would not be a proper indictment. we are giving away our defenses but we are that confident in our case keep them from indicting him. harvey, they are also trying to disbar john eastman. now, offering a legal theory that the establishment doesn t like is now grounds again, i didn t happen to agree with his legal reaching but it s
his public statement. in terms of the destroying of the tapes, we think these tapes obviously have given the prosecutors a roadmap to some of the efforts we ve made to hide these documents, to move them from room to room and you see, from the documents, from the indictments, that they have information from these tapes about who was in that room at one time, and talking with whom. you can imagine very valuable to the court case is being developed. yeah, there are a lot of details and all of this. so, trump s lawyers met with special counsel prosecutors thursday morning. everyone thought it was to talk potential election interference. january six indictment. was that what the meeting was about? or might it have been these two indictments? well, it s a good question. remember, the last time he did put out this first indictment, he did, in fact, invite in donald trump s lawyers to make their last case about why he should be indicted stop him from indicting him, obviously. if that s
indictment against the former president. if they don t stick, you have the possibility that he and his team use this case to dismiss all of the other cases. i think the other cases are even more serious. i don t want to downplay this case because michael cohen did go to jailfor the same thing. on the other hand, this is the former president, and it is a very big deal to even contemplate indicting him. we don t know what it s even for at this point. as indicting him. we don t know what it s even for at this point.- it s even for at this point. as you ooint it s even for at this point. as you point out. it s even for at this point. as you point out. the it s even for at this point. as you point out, the details it s even for at this point. as you point out, the details of - it s even for at this point. as you point out, the details of that i point out, the details of that indictment i haven t been the least, but what we have heard, reaction from donald trump, who released a long st
oi’ him politically. whether it will or not that remains to be seen, and some people have speculated this might backfire on democrats, or cause headaches forjoe biden. that is difficult to predict, but it is hard to say that an indictment is good news for the person who is indicted. it is going to be, no matter whether donald trump onset site two are characterises it this way or not, this is going to be a distraction for donald trump and this will be of an opening for donald trump s opponent to our running arm a run against him for president to say there is too much drama around donald trump. there are too many complications. this is going to be too much of a potential pitfall, and that is going to plan something i have heard from many republicans, which as they like donald trump as president, they liked what he did as president, they liked what he did as president, they liked his policies, but they don t liked his policies, but they don t like is all the drama around him, all of the
to the pawn star, stormy daniels, and others. but as there is no indication whether they have decided another indictment should be brought against the former president was that i m joined by sarahjones, editor in chief of a us new side. what is your take on all of this? what is your take on all of this? what do we read into this claim from the former president? first what do we read into this claim from the former president? the former president? first of all, he made this the former president? first of all, he made this claim the former president? first of all, he made this claim without - the former president? first of all, he made this claim without even l he made this claim without even knowing he made this claim without even knowing he is going to be undoubted ithink knowing he is going to be undoubted i think is knowing he is going to be undoubted i think is very telling. i think he has been i think is very telling. i think he has been doing what he has been doing ha