Stretched these statutes in order to try to capture this behavior. Laura for me the words farcical. Ridiculous, abusive those words came to mind. But, after going over the document for the second time earlier today i realized its far worse than any of that what jack smith and his boss Merrick Garland are doing not just to trump, but to the nation Going Forward is devastating. Now, the doj, the white house, every member of Congress Knows the truth. The rag tag group of maga supporters who busted into the capitol on january 6th it no meaningful effect on the democratic process on that day. Only propagandists could call it an insurrection. After all, the election was certified and Donald Trump Left Office on january 20th. The real conspiracists working to deprive people of their rights are found at the department of justice. And their Press Spokesman include news anchors, reporters, and pundits across the regime media. I think the sum total of their knowledge about law and history seems t
wouldn t have made but one i disagreed with at the time and disagree with now but it s not a criminal act to have a novel legal theory about something. even if it s about something like the electors and the constitution. advice given from an attorney used to be sacrosanct and it usually falls under the attorney-client privilege. but this is just another norm that the left will sacrifice on the altar of getting trump. telling fox news that he believes eastman is one of the co-spirits in the latest trump indictment but that he will never plead guilty to this anything related to this we are going to take this to trial. joining me now is that attorney co-counsel sill for john eastman harvey. harvey, good to see you don t. what makes you so confident in your case? well, because the eastman advice was in the realm of good faith legal advice. it was certainly cutting edge. it was creative but, you know, that s what good lawyers are supposed to do.
don t have any real fear that eastman is going to be convicted in the end. it s going to be a long, painful expensive process if they indict him. i hope they don t. by the way, we are early next week john burr ma am, who is the chief counsel, he brought me into the case and i are sending a memorandum to the department of justice arguing, explaining in law why this would not be a proper indictment. we are giving away our defenses but we are that confident in our case keep them from indicting him. harvey, they are also trying to disbar john eastman. now, offering a legal theory that the establishment doesn t like is now grounds again, i didn t happen to agree with his legal reaching but it s
somebody passionate a lot of reputreputreputations with are o down the sewer. will. laura: you didn t vet for donald trump. every civil libertarian across the country should be outrablegd when you actually can t fund your on defense and they are trying to remove your ability to work before the court case is even proceeded. for a legal dispute. harvey, i know we will have you back. we have got to roll. thank you for joining us tonight. he has got a defendant who is looking at probably six trials. it is entirely realistic to have this case before the general election. hard to imagine voters coming to a judgment on who should be the next president if this trial has not happened. jack smith s team is in a race against the clock. there s just no other way to say it. laura: a race against the clock. huh? why might that be? if you are sitting inside president biden s wilmington re-election headquarters, a new york times poll confirms the current political reality. donald trump c