In your package its the preferred solution. Theyll describe what theyve not exempted on that. Commissioner pearlman i have a technical request about the bar building thats referred to in 3 places as 3 materials as cast stone and on page 6 Indiana Limestone and on another page its another material. I believe that the cast stone that resembles indiana line. So one the city attorneys. Basically, the ordinance just talks about the district the ordinance is written as effecting any nonsecondary structures in the c3 r downtown zoning district. So if you narrow this down to the parcel then in the report it has been advised for this particular structure i understand that. And in the commission what the commission is to accomplish on page 7 of the draft ordinance it will allow the demolition and reconstruction only if the proposed removal and construction will come to several things. It says in the terms it doesnt apply in the Historic District it it were affected okay sponsor if you folks want
With that, ill let sue take over and if you have any questions, ill be happy to answer them so to kind of wrap up up the schedule for this element. Were proposing to close the commentary weve extended that and to include the comments we are going to have a couple of for hearings on the park commissions and i think thats on the 27th. So let me know if you have any questions or comments. Right off the timing of this being adapted and the preservation element i mean, theres no way the prejudice element is going to be ready how does that get into this. That is one of the general plan elements there will be 8 preservation elements but there will be a much more thorough and Historic Preservation. Whats our ideal timeline getting it done and approved. Great question tim fry Department Staff in the 2014 2015 staff well start engaging the public and the process conservatively it will take a couple of years. Along with the recreation and upper Design Elements there are friendly policies that are
Schedule for this element. Were proposing to close the commentary weve extended that and to include the comments we are going to have a couple of for hearings on the park commissions and i think thats on the 27th. So let me know if you have any questions or comments. Right off the timing of this being adapted and the preservation element i mean, theres no way the prejudice element is going to be ready how does that get into this. That is one of the general plan elements there will be 8 preservation elements but there will be a much more thorough and Historic Preservation. Whats our ideal timeline getting it done and approved. Great question tim fry Department Staff in the 2014 2015 staff well start engaging the public and the process conservatively it will take a couple of years. Along with the recreation and upper Design Elements there are friendly policies that are in all the elements so there isnt anything to preclude us to adding anything to what were drafted and showing you today.
The Steel Framing articulate the facade and break both into bays and atrocities a rhythm to the facade and expresses underlying contrary manner that is in con forbearance to the requirement of earlier 11. To address the ar c comments regarding the structure the revised structure hazed stairs and landing. To subtleness it came palatable. They have less horizontal complexities. The proposed project extends to the property lines of posting and stockton street and reenforce the structure. To a hallow building at the corner will be acceptable it is based on the corner square they range in height from 3 to 5 stories and to the west is the only historic this on the street. Within the broader street the structures range differently and their adjacent to a much taller buildings and the proposed structure a appropriate per overall it matches and it consistent with the buildings throughout the district and it in compliance with article 11. While theres no specific requirements in the Historic Dis
Did discuss about the prejudice element and start engaging this commission and the public on what that preservation element should contain. We will start having conversations and well talk about the spovp and maybe well be able to have that broader decision but we see the logical reason to add that to the open space element. So if you have any questions about the prejudice element ill be happy to answer them after susan presentation. We shared the draft presentations with architecture heritage in San Francisco. I see that ms. Smith from the architecture heritage is in the audience i dont know if her comments represent the Architecture Group but she can respond to the draft policies. With that, ill let sue take over and if you have any questions, ill be happy to answer them so to kind of wrap up up the schedule for this element. Were proposing to close the commentary weve extended that and to include the comments we are going to have a couple of for hearings on the park commissions and