had a few minutes with the report. andrew, let me get your first reactions to anything that has leapt out at you, if anything. recognizing that you ve only had a few minutes, i m gonna give you more time to read, this but this is just your first headline reaction to it. yeah no i see dan and i are doing the same thing. we are trying to do two things at the same time. this is a monumental, or as you said, it is over 800 pages and there are four appendices that look fascinating, addressing such minor issues as the preparation of law enforcement to meet the challenges of january 6th and whether there was foreign interference in the 2020 election there were these appendices, and they re trying to take the entire report. and then the table of contents is really, to me, attracts what i think is the genius of the january six committee. which is really focusing on all of the different ways that the former president tried to stay in office. as opposed to just thinking about january
Frasiers left hook. He connected. Feet off the ground, flying through the air, left hook, boom. Really hit him hard. Before we even got to a trial. He said we know fraud when we see it. Weve looked at all the evidence, this is fraud. There will be a version of the trial maybe starting next week. Well get more details in a minute. The judge could not have been more clear in his ruling yesterday that what donald trump and the organization perpetrated over many, many years, in his eyes, is fraud. Yeah, part of the case brought by new York Attorney general Letitia James. Well get to that in just a moment. Thats our top story. Also ahead, the History Making Stop on the picket line for President Biden. Well show you what he had to say to striking autoworkers who are demanding a significant pay raise. Plus, senator bob menendez is refusing to resign despite calls from 2 dozen colleagues to do so following his indictment on bribery charges. You wouldnt believe the republicans who are now defen
Commentary, newsmaker interviews and panel discussions. Finance violations. Far worse crimes committed by others. Earlier today, bret baier raises very, very important question. Lets take a look. Speak of Campaign Finance violation, because the way he phrased it, he was directed by the candidate to do that and submitted that money to be repaid by the trumpy organization, that is a direct liability. But i cany. Already see the bate lines being drawn here illegally because i just got an email saying the fact that he pleads guilty to Campaign Violations does not mean that the payments were criminal violations. This did not go to trial and you could have people like former fec chairman Bradley Smith saying that payment is not a violation, which is what Rudy Giuliani was saying in his interview earlier. So that, you can arty begin to the Trump Lawyers potentially, and others, make my case that this would not be a violation. Obviously the prosecutors. Sayig it is and Michael Cohen is on the
yes, and you waste a really good point which is i m really interested in reading a lot of the text messages that the committee got, some of which that we ve learned about, but i m sure there are many many more that we have not learned about yet. some reporting that mark meadows had texted with, you know, more than 30 members of congress, republican members of congress during the two months postelection before january six. i would love to see those, another contemporaneous text on january six, obviously incredibly important evidence. while i personally may take a little issue with your characterization that this is the best house reports [laughter] ever written and we ll stand up for our impeachment reports, it is it will be really important to dig into the a lot of the and notes as andrew said.
congress during the two months postelection before january six. i would love to see those, another contemporaneous text on january six, obviously incredibly important evidence. while i personally may take a little issue with your characterization that this is the best house reports [laughter] ever written and we ll stand up for our impeachment reports, it is it will be really important to dig into the a lot of the and notes as andrew said. many of which are further explanation for some of the testimony. the last thing that i was just looking at is to further to the cassidy hutchinson s obstruction of justice that we have been talking about. what other efforts were there to obstruct justice? what other efforts were there to stonewall the investigation? the committee notes that 30