it is a very fair question. i just think we re trying to change an entire system here, partly can you do that by your own behaviors. that s exemplary. i would think anybody who s concerned about climate change ought to be very concerned about their own carbon impact. at the same time, we re trying to achieve political change in america as it is. and it s hard to do that without burn something fossil fuels. tucker: i understand that. there are practical limits to people s ability to live out their beliefs. but do i think it calls into question the sincerity of a person whoo s frame little debate in moral terms if he falls so far short f i m a shoexman for peta but operate a slaughter house on the side i m less believable. that makes sense. i don t think climate change is framed in moral terms. it s put in practical, pragmatic terms.
and that kind of issue is serious. i don t think climate change ranks in the top ten list when you consider that we have these asymmetric threats of islamic terrorism, organized to destroy western civilization. you have nation states like russia on the run, where we re pulling back, trading big problems for ourselves and our allies. you see the threats on israel. the threats to europe across the board. we have serious national security challenges in this world today because of the weakness of the obama/clinton foreign policy. and that would be the answer i think that most people would want to hear. you re probably right. meanwhile, we know that while they were preparing for the debate yesterday, you were rolling out your plan to repeal obamacare. for the folks who are unfamiliar with your plan, if selected president of the united states, give us an idea about it. well, instead of having this massive obamacare with massive subsidies, and $1.7 trillion of taxes, we would repeal the m