it is a very fair question. i just think we re trying to change an entire system here, partly can you do that by your own behaviors. that s exemplary. i would think anybody who s concerned about climate change ought to be very concerned about their own carbon impact. at the same time, we re trying to achieve political change in america as it is. and it s hard to do that without burn something fossil fuels. tucker: i understand that. there are practical limits to people s ability to live out their beliefs. but do i think it calls into question the sincerity of a person whoo s frame little debate in moral terms if he falls so far short f i m a shoexman for peta but operate a slaughter house on the side i m less believable. that makes sense. i don t think climate change is framed in moral terms. it s put in practical, pragmatic terms.
i think it stinks. that s my keen polit will insight. keen poe lit cal insight. it wouldn t bother me if it was anything else, but they called it coffee. they called it tea bagers so they would be democrats or d-bagers, correct? where does the d come from? democrats. that s pretty bad. we just need a pot of coffee and then we are having our own. i want a wine spritzer party and you are all invited. they need to be going somewhere. then you can say, there is a real movement. i say that because cnn gave them too much credence. they are a middle class white people. they got to grow a peered. this is nothing. go out and break something. there you go. great advice from the professor. commit acts of violence. i said break something. burn something. for breaking things he could just mean boundaries. that s what i m talking