that is another humanitarian. there is so much sensitive information that come been compromised. well cambridge analytica employees were sitting next to brad pascal in sant and so were facebook employees. they were all working together. so this is a interesting story that exposes this vast world that many facebook users had nooid w nooid idea about. and this 87 million is the total number that could have been. and that is the answer until it changes and it is a bigger number. i wan i want to ask you, mark zuckerberg reminds me of republicans circa 1970, thinking that being transparent is an undervald rtue, has the huberous to think facebook is so good it could do anything. where do you think it is heading in terms of regulation on capitol hill. he is tone deaf and slow to respond and the company got warnings about the peep the people s information could be scraped by searching phone
supply chain is going to be much more significant than the administration is playing up. and then there is one more effect which we shouldn t downgrade. and that is if you start to see price inflation on things like manufactured goods that use these products, that could make the fed have to hike rates sooner than it would like and that would cause everybody s debt to get more expensive, it could also cause bigger correction in the stock market. so with that said, give us the best and worst scenario for the middle class consumer. so the best scenario is that we find out on monday that this is a lot of uberous, maybe the president backs down and there are many ways that a tariff if it was implemented could be implemented. it could be targeted on certain countries. we can hope that it wasn t a blanket tariff on some of our allies. that is already by the way having creating real concerns in europe, there are retaliatory measures being talked about on jeans and motorcycles in the
that there were three additional deputies outside of the school in addition to that school resource officer. we haven t confirmed that for sure. those are just reports. and i would love to sit down and interview them and find out what protocol was. what they were allowed to do. if you look at any other business. the top guy, when something like this happens. and lives are lost. the top guy usually is forced to step down. why won t he take any responsibility? you know, i have never i mean, i m being completely candid in 17 years in law enforcement and in doing commentary on these matters afterwards. i have never seen a case of uberous so overtake a ace of what should have been leadership. not only is this sheriff out, is he doing commentary on the media whereas you saw in that spot there, is he talking about amazing leadership. amazing i mean, how callus to the families. guys, this was an epic human tragedy. you are talking about amazing leadership while parents have to deal wit
which is ironic. but indeed they are still individuals today in washington, d.c. that do have this type of relationship with foreign governments and have all sorts of fishy transactions with foreign governments and hopefully this will bring attention to this and we ll see if there is a will in congress to start changing some of the laws. some of the laws need to be changed but i think some people are going to look around and go, that could be me. i better be careful. and some of the people there are people looking at this and say what are the ways i need to change what i m doing. the second thing that will happen is that i think people are going to wonder whether or not they should go into politics, if they have all of the dealings. the question that i keep asking myself, if you knew you were doing this stuff, what in the world were you doing getting in a national campaign. just stop and make your money and continue to be in the shadows. and it is huberous. and the powers of
in fact, our rert poing indicates it s not something he wants to focus on when it comes up in meetings. some of his defenders would rather attack the reporters and find trash on us to subvert any evidence to talk about this. david gregory, last word? that s the point, the legal questions are so important but they re narrow. the broader point, there were active measures by the russians, they were probing, interfering, trying to undermine our election and perhaps sway the result. it doesn t appear that they succeeded based on what we know to date, but they ll keep trying. the problem is in trump in his rhetoric and in trump junior in his actions, we have some window in the fact that they were welcoming this. that s the kind of arrogance, uberous, naivete at the very least that is a foundation for it happening again. that s the policy concern here. look, it s so stark that the new york post, certainly a friend to president trump from its editorial staff to its owner