permitted to run for a third term, he would ve won. could he have? and regardless of that, was that really the kind of thing you want to say? it is it s not the thing that you want to say. i don t believe based on how americans feel about the country, only 30% think the country s headed in the right direction. it s very hard to win an election when possess mix is that high. that most people feel 78% feel we are weaker today, that the world is a more dangerous place than it was, that they feel less secure today. how do you win an election when three out of four voters think that your foreign policy has essentially failed? it s a huberous and i understand why he did it because he doesn t want to be held responsible for hillary clinton s loss but by the same token when you asked questions about the condition of the america today versus eight years ago there are a lot of those questions that the public says no, not only are we not better off, i m for afraid, more
upon very shortly. i haven t been able to make the payments for almost a year now since the accident. i really need to sell as much as possible because i haven t worked in two years. just catch us up, where are we now in the whole process? we re waiting for the judge to make a decision. potentially, i could go over and be sentenced. i mean, the state is attempting to put me away for nine years. so, you know, god willing that doesn t happen. my prayer now is just to be in the place i need to be to embrace whatever the journey is. as i look back now really honestly, i recognize my arrogance. there s a lot of huberous that
would know how to bring isis to the table or defeat isis very quickly and i am not going to tell you what it is tonight. if i run and i win i don t want the enemy to know what i am going to do. all i can tell you is it is a foolproof way of winning. it is foolproof. is donald trump a sociopath? who runs around saying they have the answer, but he is not going to tell you. he is a confident man whether you like him or not. we need a chander in chief who is going to make decisions. i like he is confident whether he know what s he is doing or not. that s okay. you. we want more. we have had no shortage of huberous. to want to be they do plenty of stuff too.
megyn kelly s show and discussed it. listen. he was so aggressive. when you look back at that interview it s not a bulldog investigative. it s a political partisan. set defender of the clintons for whom he once worked. i think that s unfortunate. he was a terrific political operator during of the time he was in bill clinton s ear during the early 90 s. i think for him to do this, it creates a great deal of uberous and i think he will be be really in a tough spot trying to shake this off. trying to shake it off so he is not going to be doing the debate but if he is so conflicted he can t do the debate how he lead the political coverage for abc with his ties to the clintons in the first place. he is the host of the biggest morning show and cash cow at good morning america. it s hard to see them firing him. he is not getting enough credit for pretty outrageous and apology. in his quote apology he says basically i just care so
mary kissel. i m going to start with you, mary, because you are sitting across from me. how did they get this so wrong? clearly there was an element of uberous here. they did see it coming. they called cantor s people and cantor s people didn t want the help. the polling was clearly very very off. it s important tomorrow if a size, too, that brat really labeled cantor an insider or washington insider. and part of that is true. he voted for flood insurance expansion. he has been behind the export/import bank. we editorial page on that. but some of it is also not true he had to make political deals because he has been in washington a long time. would he educate the voters why he made the decision we will not know. a couple messages here for the g.o.p. one of which is the g.o.p. has to stand up and explain why immigration is good for america. because the majority of americans support it. and, secondly, they need to take on crony capitalism.