viewer ratings are as much as those ad ratings coming in, and they ve gotten crucified with the way women have been projected and they have spent a huge amount of time, effort and research on how time, effort and research on how weapon are portrayed. for those advertisers to start to clue into the fact it is women who control more house hold income and spending than men do in their homes, they re starting to say, it doesn t make sense, what this program or this personality represents is not reflective of our brand. from a women s leadership perspective, it is a positive. as we are seeing dmurnlt administration, the rollback of equality legislation. women have worried, are we moving backwards? when you start to see companies, actual dollars say, this is not what we represent. we re moving and fox to do the same. it is a positive. well, fox has done it before. it is progress and progress
take a look at this ad in the wall street journal. first of all i want to draw your attention to the cartoon. there is obama on a tortoise with a whip. what was it supposed to be the tortoise and the hare? the newspaper denied the catchy cartoon but every word was written by glen hubbard. here in the second to last paragraph is the claim. president romney would create about 12 million new jobs in his first term and millions more after that. which means 250,000 jobs each and every single one of his 48 months in office. he says he will do that by cutting regulations and cutting taxes. does it add up? first the good news. tlt have been a few times in american history where this has happened. the chief economists of jp morgan notes it happened in the 1990s. that is where the good news ends for the romney jobs claim. since 1939 only 27% of monthly jobs reports have shown growth of 250,000 jobs or more. the research also notes the united states has never had four straight years whe
good evening. i m erin burnett. mitt makes a bold promise. 12 million jobs. take a look at this ad in the wall street journal. first of all i want to draw your attention to the cartoon. there is obama on a tuortoise with a whip. what was it supposed to be the tortoise and the hare? the newspaper denied the catchy cartoon but every word was written by glen hubbard. here in the second to last paragraph is the claim. president romney would create about 12 million new jobs in his first term and millions more after that. which means 250,000 jobs each and every single one of his 48 months in office. he says he will do that by cutting regulations and cutting taxes. does it add up? first the good news. tlt have been a few times in american history where this has happened. the chief economists of jp morgan notes it happened in the 1990s. that is where the good news ends for the romney jobs claim. since 1939 only 27% of monthly jobs reports have shown growth of 250,000 jobs or more. th
these are red states. he is the leading republican. he should be winning the state. he is going to win those with his hands tied behind his back. he did win the under $30,000 house hold income in ohio. he is beginning to broaden this out. part of this is a media sensation. is barack obama going to win alabama? it s irrelevant. are alabamaens and mississippians excited about romney? they are excited about barack obama. not about romney. he should be able to make an affirmative case. jennifer is excited about him but a lot of republicans are not. i want to talk about this related to what rick santorum said about this becoming a two person race and how much more it can excite the race. let s take a look at that video? when it becomes a two person
president is running for re-election, the question that voters ask themselves is are we better off today than we were four years ago? correct. so if this congress can make sure that people cannot answer that question yes, if this congress can stand in the way and say, no, wait a minute, i m definitely not better today because i have $1,000 out of my house hold income, definitely not better because there aren t jobs, definitely not better because social security is less secure, then they are hoping that the only person who will have to pay is the president. now, ironically when we look at this graph, the thing that surprises us in the whole debate is how americans now say, according to polls, they trust the president more than the gop on taxes, and i think that when you look at that, they are losing. in fact, there s a downturn in terms of trust for the gop. yeah. and an upturn for the president because i think every chance they got, i m talking