Several other policies sprinkled through the preservation element exclusively policies 1. 8 which states develop and maintain and official city register of identified Historic Resources and associated documentation which should be made readily available to Property Owners and Government Agency and policy related that we wanted to educate the public about and policy 11 which is to collect guidelines to protect artifact of the historical San Francisco understanding of the environment that we collect this information and under objective 7 we can go further and talk about how to distribute that information. There is objective six which we looked at our last hearing, the entire objective focuses on promoting Historic Preservation through incentives and guidance. Its closely related to the intent of objective 7 with a slight focus. With that im going to jump to policies and we have 7. 1, promote awareness of San Franciscos Historic Resources. Again, we have a terminology issue here. We would
Considering building replacement that is inphantomable and chinatown as a cohe has state of our heritage is an speedometer into the future i know there are other issues but some suggestions being made that the empress of china joins the registration of cultural importance and i hope that you and other presentations will mention chinatown because while theyre still many living owners probably generational changes go as much in the making we need to help to address this and front on and overall possible techniques for this to go throw the proper process. Thank you for appointing the empress of china its one of our legacy bars and restaurant and sadly one the businesses that is most enthusiastically about the initial round in the early 2013 so its challenging a real loss for chinatown if that occurs. For the empress that emphasis if the owners want to sell the building for over 20 million how can a open space compete with that pressure to help them stay in place. I hope that what we are s
Landmarks and im very supportive of both of those. Commissioner johns . I think we should have this issue placed on the agenda to get the proper focus that it needs and there may be some folks in the p be who would have some suggestions or some observations about how this really should be accomplished. Commissioner hyland . This is a question for staff. In your staff report you said the one fte that we requested had not been additional. That would have been in addition to that and we were hoping that was going to be dedicated. Thats the question i keep asking. So there is one existing ft exterior wall that f te that has been budgeted for the last three 3 years. Staff requested one additional fte that was granted and working on solely one dell nation. Designation. We are working on our finance and admin team to find responsibilities around to achieve that without adding another person. I think at the september 17th hearing well be able to give you more concrete information on that. Mayb
Actual lp at some point. Very glad that this is moving forward and that there will be an element. Not only that, its really important for the Planning Commission to have an element to look at and to guide themselves with too. It suspect just isnt just the Preservation Commission but the Planning Commission needs that element so they can say, hey, the preservation element is this. Lastly, he is on vacation, but i think he should always be on vacation. Thank you, mr. Sugaya. Good afternoon commissioners, mike bueller with heritage. I would like to briefly note we strongly support staffs recommendation regarding policies in objective seven and in terms of commissioner matsudas comments, there are numerous case studies in the report that relate to this section of the elements that we think are particularly effective and could perhaps be included in implementation measures such as youth led walking tours and heritage and cultural trails. I did no. See Cultural Heritage and tour programs, we
The discussion on the nonprofit and legacy businesses in my view so thats something ill be looking for criteria around future projects. Commissioner moore. Two comments of appreciation that youre doing it at the time youre doing it i greatly appreciate our underpinning the statement for world cities is not a notebook and cranny country but paris i appreciate this warning to the Planning Department and staff mr. Kelly to really take a board and anymore comprehensive look at this juncture i dont think that the central selma plan can pass which indeed address what was presented as youre looking across the city the one neighborhood you didnt mention was chinatown the closing of the empress of china with no mitigating idea yet presented it will fall within a legacy registering rather than considering building replacement that is inphantomable and chinatown as a cohe has state of our heritage is an speedometer into the future i know there are other issues but some suggestions being made that