The landmarks program, but we dont seem to have enough resources in order to process these and just learning today that we did not get the one head count in order to pursue this forward. Do we need to agenda ized further discussion to have a further conversation about moving this forward. We have made several projects on landmark but they have been initiated. We need some resources to identify this progress. Mr. Frye and i have spoken on this previously outside of this chamber in how do we track and follow our monthly allocation, and what i always worry about is that we have staff that is doing both active, private enterprise projects as well as landmark Background Research for the work program. And, everyone is hot to get these other projects done because there is a time issue for our sponsor but then our history k program sort lags because there is not on the front burner if you will. I think we do need to come up with a way, is it that one staff person has pulled and put per quarter
Journal, as best as bestos, shingles, stucco and things like they apply puddy and stone that you make your mom and vase in kindergarten, all kinds of things. Underneath there are valuable Historic Structures that can be restored especially when there is a historic program. My colleagues from alliance mentioned asking each project bhert where the building facade had been remodeled to consider preserving it. For example the house next to jim segals house and you can see the shadows and the possibility. I hope they are going to do some of that, its pretty far down, the stucco is down and hope they are restoring it to the proper portions. I dont know that all people contractors and owners realize that they even had a victorian building. My house at 584 page street was built in 1894 by Daniel Einstein and its stucco and very deco and has a two 2car garage. But someone who didnt know thinks it a deco building and it was published on hate raegs showing this cottage. Thats Public Awareness abo
Mitigating idea yet presented it will fall within a legacy registering rather than considering building replacement that is inphantomable and chinatown as a cohe has state of our heritage is an speedometer into the future i know there are other issues but some suggestions being made that the empress of china joins the registration of cultural importance and i hope that you and other presentations will mention chinatown because while theyre still many living owners probably generational changes go as much in the making we need to help to address this and front on and overall possible techniques for this to go throw the proper process. Thank you for appointing the empress of china its one of our legacy bars and restaurant and sadly one the businesses that is most enthusiastically about the initial round in the early 2013 so its challenging a real loss for chinatown if that occurs. For the empress that emphasis if the owners want to sell the building for over 20 million how can a open spa
In the process. Lets make a list and do it in a rational way. In that before we go to the september 17th meeting and talk about this again we weigh out what resources are available for a project. Is there someone involved to help this move forward. We did this before and we had commissioner alumni martinez here and did this before as we figure out how to get this off the list and which have the resources on a volunteer basis from the public. Eye i would suggest we add it to the list and not add additional staff time. Would you mind if we move to september. Fine. Thank you. With that well close for these two items and if we could then, because we have a conflict. I make a motion to recuse commissioner pearlman. Second. There is a motion and a second. Commissioner hyland, yes, commissioner johnck, yes, john, yes, commissioner matsuda, pearlman, commissioner hasz, that passes 70. We heard and did not comment on the 199 carl situation. Do we have any questions for staff at this time . Seei
Addressed the stakeholders. This objective seven relates to several other policies sprinkled through the preservation element exclusively policies 1. 8 which states develop and maintain and official city register of identified Historic Resources and associated documentation which should be made readily available to Property Owners and Government Agency and policy related that we wanted to educate the public about and policy 11 which is to collect guidelines to protect artifact of the historical San Francisco understanding of the environment that we collect this information and under objective 7 we can go further and talk about how to distribute that information. There is objective six which we looked at our last hearing, the entire objective focuses on promoting Historic Preservation through incentives and guidance. Its closely related to the intent of objective 7 with a slight focus. With that im going to jump to policies and we have 7. 1, promote awareness of San Franciscos Historic