[inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] if i could invite everyone to take your seats. We are right on time, so it is a great pleasure to invite my dear friend Ellie Cohanim and her fellow panelists for our second panel, enriching the u. S. Is really alliance by combating antisemitism. [applause] good afternoon, everyone. So wonderful to be here with you. And before we start i really want to just take a moment and thank the Heritage Foundation for dr. Kevin roberts and for victoria coates, who for a while has been thinking about holding this important conversation about the u. S. Israel relationship. And we were talking this weekend and she said she believes its Divine Providence because who knew how important this conversation would be at this moment in time . So again so grateful to victoria coates, to the Heritage Foundation for having us today. I want to start with introducing my esteemed panel here who im so honored to be monitoring this conversation. On the right is r
Group in the primary purpose is the Iranian Nuclear program neck you can watch the rest of this program if you go to cspan now you up. U. S. Israel alliance hosted by the Heritage Foundation here in washington d. C. Thank you all for joining us today for this profoundly timely event on the 75th anniversary of u. S. Israel alliance, i like to start with the prayer. Heavenly father, pray for our friends in israel and all americans that they stand with our israeli friends and the jewish people in this terrible time, we pray for your guidance and wisdom as we go through these discussions today and not only celebrate anniversary is required. The timing of this event because we have been talking about this for two years so we hoped to have it this may and i was upset what was rescheduled and felt like i failed but to be able to join together today and talk about these topics, talk about u. S. Israel Security Alliance and antisemitism two weeks after the horrific responsibility for heritage t
, im not going too far, im telling it like it is, if we hand over the jerboa today, i dont know how we will live later, they want money for the release of the jerboa, i ll get that money, even if i have to break the law, well, who doesnt agree , its better to go out now, then it will be too late, okay, i agree, but on one condition, what . No corpses, i promise you that, yeah. Since the 14th century, the process of collecting russian lands has been going on. The moscow appanage principality became the basis of a single centralized russian state. The lands northeast of moscow, the territory of the modern yaroslavl region, finally became part of it in the second half of the 15th century. The yaroslavl region is located in the central part of russia , northeast of moscow, from the capital. Yaroslavl is about 270 km away, when traveling, you can get to the city by road or railway, travel time by electric train no more than 4 hours. One of the oldest russian cities, yaroslavl, was founded b
Ukraines independence. I think that russian lands should go to russia. And let experts criticize me, as a historian, i believe that galicia is not ukrainian land. And the population is there far from ukrainian. Therefore, if ukraine is divided along historical borders, hungarians will remain wellfed. The poles and certainly the romanians will remain satisfied. According to the results of the lawsuit to the ministry of justice, vaks collected the property of the traitorous tobacconist from the state income. Half an apartment, five plots of land, a residential building near kyiv with an area of 673 m2. Cash in the amount of usd 144 and claims to cash in the amount of about uah 41 million. By. Work for the enemy of the exminister of education was also sentenced in absentia to 15 years of imprisonment. In general, the fresh list of the ministry of justice includes 13 traitors and collaborators, from gauleiter to lowranking officials in the temporarily occupied territories of ukraine.
In fact, it happened as a result of the creation of the socalled unified information policy, but i honestly do not see the sense in this unified information policy for the last couple of years, but the question of what we should do with it is a little off topic here, because we have nothing to do with we cannot do this, only express our opinion, the authorities remain consistent in repeating that the telethon is necessary for them. Is learning, yes, i agree with you, but the authorities are also learning, and they very often react, so to speak, their messages hit, i dont know, the bar, yes, and here we see that these efforts, who were entrusted with the telethon, that they have already exhausted themselves to a certain extent, and it is necessary to somehow rethink what is called the loss of the audience, it is not for nothing that the federation of european journalists mentions the fact that people are starting to switch to alternative. Sources of information, that is , they watch opp