Developments in Donald Trumps ongoing legal battles. In a newly unsealed brief in response to the supreme Courts President ial Immunity Ruling, special Counsel Jack Smith gives us the clearest view yet of his 2020 Election Interference Case against the former president. Smith asserts trump acted as a private candidate and not as president , when he tried to overturn the Election Results and resorted to crimes to stay in office. It also provides new evidence about Trumps Phone Usage and the conversations he had on the 6th Of January, as the riots were unfolding at the capitol. Quote, beginning at about 150. 30 p. M. the defendant settled in the Dining Room off of the oval office. He spent the afternoon there reviewing twitter on his phone, while the Dining Room television played Fox News contemporaneous coverage of events at the capitol. Citing testimony, the filing says that when trump was informed his Vice President had to be rushed to a secure location after trump attacked pence in h
men in jerry joins me live. jerry joins me live good evening, if you thought the era of republicans using a migrant children as political pawns ended in 2017, as donald trump s cruel and discussing child separation border policy was exposed to the world. well, you would be sadly mistaken. i want you to take a long hard look at this newborn baby, this infant who along with some 50 other mainly venezuelan asylum seekers was she noted family man greg abbott, texas governor to the doorstep of vice president kamala harris as d.c. residents early yesterday. a baby, who uses a baby to score partisan points? the texas governor s move was just a latest development in a vial game of political one-upmanship, taking place on the gop. as we placed trump want to be point out that there are more than racist enough to be the party s new standard standard bearer. in the past you ve probably heard of what would jesus do, from the american right, i may be muslim but i think i could rather confi
statements or about holding a press conference. the justice department declined all of those requests that i was just referencing because we did not think that they were appropriate based on the facts and the law. repeated attempts to over turn the election. much of yesterday hearing focused on jeffrey clark who played a central role in pushing trump s false election frauds and who trump wanted to install as the acting attorney general. just hours before yesterday s hearing, federal agents raided clark s home. we ll have much more on what led them to do that. our panel of experts join us as we cover the angles. the sarah, the select committee bringing into focus doj official jeffrey clark s role. significant role in the former president s scheme. yes, absolutely. rolling out how former president trump wanted to just set aside jeff rosen and steal jeffrey clark as the acting attorney general. look, the witnesses are in person and in their video testimony were not holding
fathers, sisters and brothers, and i care about them. i care about the human rights, and those mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers in palestine that i care about. i care about the human rights. you know, i think the thing to keep in mind then and i were not involved in that decision. the decision by the company not to sell ice cream and the occupied palestinian territories. it s consistent with the values that the company s had throughout its history. fighting for human rights and dignity. the reason we re on here talking is not about that decision. as it s been said, it s about the governance. that s about the independent board having the authority to do what it is granted to do in the acquisition. while, we ll have to see what happens in the next step of this legal struggle. i know it s coming up in a few weeks. we appreciate you taking time out, but we ll have to leave it there. ben cohen, jerry green field,
supermajority, all true, all well, centrist senator. my question, is whether you and your fellow democrats willing to do to stop them, why no endorsement even now of court expansion, i just don t get it. . we have an array of reforms that we have already put out. that are pretty strong, and some cases. a lot of it is transparency, just bringing the cord up to speed with the executive, and legislative branches, and their own lower courts. some of it is a little bit stronger in terms of putting term limits on the judges, i think like any good lawyer, you want to make your case before you ask for your extraordinary relief. and we have not yet, i don t think, fully made the case to the american public, although they are really listening now in the ways of wake of the dobbs decision, the new york guns case, and the novel theories dropped and laws against polluters.