Absorb. For the 3 jackson, weve also agreed with the community to monitor rider ship. In part because we continue to have concerns about the overall strengths of jackson as a corridor but also to address any concerns about rider ship, significant rider ship changes over time. The lower haight issue it is a trade off. For the policy and governs committee we looked at three options, the proposal, compromise staff proposal or the proposal that would reduce on haight street and that proposal does address concerns for lower haight residents. It is expensive. We go from about 50 additional hours on haight street to 100. It was not costeffective to address this trade off. You had a lot of questions. Thats a good start. Maybe just one other with the inner sunset you spoke to the landscaping concern which can absolutely be addressed. I think we got a letter on that one. There was some discussion about the length of the bulbs and i know they originally proposed to be the full length of a 2car tr
Infinite variety of ways. We ask your blessing upon the members of this house as they carry on the business of our nation at this critical time in our history. Give them courage and in the face of immense challenges, a spirit of cooperation despite their differences and trust in your divine guidance as they Work Together for the common good. When the path ahead is unclear, remind them that throughout the ages your prophets and holy ones have shown us what is good, that you require nothing more of us but nothing less than to do justice, to have compassion for one another and to walk humbly with you the beginning and the end of all things. Amen. The speaker pro tempore the chair has examined the journal of the last days proceedings and announces to the house his approval thereof. Pursuant to clause 1 of rule 1 the journal stands approved. For what purpose does the gentleman from arkansas seek recognition . Mr. Speaker, pursuant to clause 1, rule 1, i demand a vote on agreeing to the spea
Corridor but also to address any concerns about rider ship, significant rider ship changes over time. The lower haight issue it is a trade off. For the policy and governs committee we looked at three options, the proposal, compromise staff proposal or the proposal that would reduce on haight street and that proposal does address concerns for lower haight residents. It is expensive. We go from about 50 additional hours on haight street to 100. It was not costeffective to address this trade off. You had a lot of questions. Thats a good start. Maybe just one other with the inner sunset you spoke to the landscaping concern which can absolutely be addressed. I think we got a letter on that one. There was some discussion about the length of the bulbs and i know they originally proposed to be the full length of a 2car train and they have come down and there were some concerns that the length were, there wasnt clarity on those. Could you walk us through . Yes, i think that has to do a little b
Reliability which i think is fortunate to have. On the idea of timing, i think that timing is important. One of the things that will help guide our timing is the work that you still have to come on the budget. So, having an understanding of what the resource envelope will be for the next 2year budget will very much guide our work on phasing. But these proposals a lot of them are linked together and thats how we see them as staff as sort of packages of improvements and the 33, 9, 22, 55 changes is an example of one of those families of changes. The 10 and 12 and the 11th is another example of a set of links proposals. So our timing will be based on where we have the greatest need, where proposals are linked together and also particularly on the fleet as the new buses an arrive getting those on the corridor as quickly as possible. We work hard to ensure the timing of this work lines up with the procurement of the new vehicles and in particular getting the 60foot trolley vehicles back on
Haight issue it is a trade off. For the policy and governs committee we looked at three options, the proposal, compromise staff proposal or the proposal that would reduce on haight street and that proposal does address concerns for lower haight residents. It is expensive. We go from about 50 additional hours on haight street to 100. It was not costeffective to address this trade off. You had a lot of questions. Thats a good start. Maybe just one other with the inner sunset you spoke to the landscaping concern which can absolutely be addressed. I think we got a letter on that one. There was some discussion about the length of the bulbs and i know they originally proposed to be the full length of a 2car train and they have come down and there were some concerns that the length were, there wasnt clarity on those. Could you walk us through . Yes, i think that has to do a little bit with doing sketches in the field versus going back and doing the actual engineering in the office. I think, d