i think that s how he s approach the job so far. i do think, to echo a case, this is going to be much closer case for the justice department then the bannon prosecution wise. meadows privilege came is weak, it has been rejected by the sitting president. it covers ground that is clearly involves government misconduct, and i figure if it were go to the courts but that s not the same things and didn t show up and do it. i think that he s kicking up a lot of gust to try to quash the supreme and i think his lawyer including a professional try to make the case that that is before the courts right, now we can t possibly indict my client, and look left himself vulnerable by not coming out in testifying about things that are privilege but excuse me that are not privileged, but i
political pressure in the way that some of the more political actors inside the administration do. he said he wanted to be an attorney general who would look only at the facts and the law and i think that is the way he approached the job so far. i do think this is a much closer case for the justice department than the bannon prosecution was. meadows privilege claim is clearly weak. it s been rejected by the sitting president. it covers ground that is clearly involving government misconduct. i think if it were to go to the courts ultimately he would lose the claim. that is not the same thing as proving a criminal case he knew he was required to testify and didn t show up and do it. i think his lawyer, one thing he has been successful at is kicking up a lot of dust. he filed a lawsuit last week to try to quash the subpoena and i think his lawyer who is a former deputy attorney general will go to the justice department and try to make the case that this is a disputed claim that is before
tucker: you didn t want the pardon? i didn t want it, because i didn t deserve it. it s one of the things with the department of justice after a six-month special counsel investigation led by a attorney that was brought an attorney general that was brought in from outside of washington, d.c. after six months he said that she basically recommended to dismiss my case for egregious government misconduct because they abused the entire system of law, and then of course then i had to deal with the court, or a judge, for about another six months who was you know, who was operating as though he was in the french system of government where he was going to be the jury, you know, the judge, and the executioner and that lasted another six months. tucker: totally out of control, judge emmet sullivan. if so you spent your entire life in the army and government service. so you didn t go to work by the way, you got out of defense intelligence, three-star general, you could have gone to
pardon? i didn t want it, because i didn t deserve it. it s one of the things with the department of justice after a six-month special counsel investigation led by a attorney that was brought an attorney general that was brought in from outside of washington, d.c. after six months he said that he basically recommended to dismiss my case for egregious government misconduct because they abused the entire system of law, and then of course then i had to deal with the court, or a judge, for about another six months who was you know, who was operating as though he was in the french system of government where he was going to be the jury, you know, the judge, and the executioner andve that lasted another six months. tucker: totally out of control, judge emmet sullivan. so you spent your entire life in the army and government service. so you didn t go to work by the way, you got out of defense intelligence, three-star general, you could have gone toa work for lockheed and don, what
person you want protecting your country. now he is gone. after that, the judge rejected, he reprimanded went to pay. also called for an investigation of possible government misconduct. thank god he did. that misconduct wasn t possible, it was certain. thank you so much for coming on. how is your son doing? he s doing well, tucker. thank you for giving us a slot to bring our plight to the american people and talking to congresspeople and thank you to the americans who showed up. it where the americans that showed up, spoke their voice, set up with our son and that s n,the reason why he s not in the brig today waiting for months and months for a court-martial to finally happen. it was because of your voice. we can t thank you enough. i want to tell you that