liberty of date which is highly unusual in and of itself. a comparison of the february 10th and february 11th 302 pluralist which shows the addition of substantial claims that were not in there before and not supported by the notes which we also attached. so people can go to the actual document and read it and see it for themselves. it s extremely concerning. it s outrageous government misconduct. the agents deliberately calculated and met to plan and strategize how to ambush and rebuke general flynn without letting him know he was officially under any kind of criminal investigation, to keep them relaxed, and they wanted to be seen as allies when in fact they knew exactly what he had said in the conversations and the intended to create a situation in which anything he said could be used against him later as a false statement without any warnings to that
302. which is highly unusual in and of itself. a comparison of the february 10th and february 11th 302s, which show the addition of substantial claims that were not in there before and not supported by the notes, which we also attached as exhibits to the document. so people can go to the actual document and read it and see it for themselves. it s extremely concerning. it s outrageous government misconduct. the agents deliberately calculated and met to plan and strategize how to ambush and interview general flynn without letting him know he was officially under any kind of criminal investigation, to keep him relaxed, and they wanted to be seen as allies, when, in fact, they knew exactly what he had said in the conversations and the intended to create a situation in which anything he said could be used against him later as a false statement without any warnings to that effect whatsoever.
choice. she had her lawyers clap back at the white house, rejecting any argument that executive privilege would apply to the very things that she was going to discuss and pointedly noting that even if executive privilege could apply, which as i mentioned in normal times it could, she went to the heart of the issue and said that privilege would still, quote, disappear altogether when there s any reason to believe government misconduct occurred. adding, prior presidents have largely agreed that executive privilege operates differently in the context of an impeachment inquiry. wow. that is spoken like someone more concerned about getting their evidence before the impeachment inquiry than trying to hold on to a government career. hill s deposition took place behind closed doors, but even from the little that we got through reporting about what she said, it is still reverberating all across washington. if her lawyer s letter was abnormal and tough, her actual testimony blew the roof off.
associates arrests, igor furman and lev parnas, they were working in this rogue diplomacy, shadow diplomacy with rudy giuliani to remove vich vich from that position. there s going to be more information coming to light on that too. in letters back and forth, in the letters that went back and forth that have been released friday fiona hill s attorneys, one line is definitely not going unnoticed is this. her attorneys write, finally we understand that deliberative process privilege, quote, disappears altogether when there is any reason to believe government misconduct occurred. what they re talking about is executive privilege that the white house of course is threatening to claim to block some of her testimony. i mean, what does this tell you? well, it tells me that the white house knows that there s something to hide here. look, you know, if you go back and look at the ways that other
likened to a drug deal and said sondland was in direct contact with the president. president trump has honored me with the job of being the u.s. ambassador to the e.u. and given me other special assignments including ukraine. reporter: in a july 10th meeting on ukraine, sondland mentioned the investigations which was seen as a reference to the investigations into the bidens. unsettled, bolten urged hill to report it to the national security counsel lawyer and prior to her appearance, attorneys braced for pushback from the white house whether she could block to testify due to executive privilege. we understand the privilege disappears altogether when there isry reason to believe government misconduct occurred. hill s lawyers wrote to white house attorneys. as republicans continue to protest impeachment inquiry look, three days out of testimony and all behind closed doors, three unique perspectives that the american people didn t get to see in this partisan and unfair process