completely opaque. yeah, so that s interesting to me. he didn t own this outright, i was a partnership, and there were some entity created to be the owner of that, that entity then sold it, then dispersed the profits to the people that were part of the partnership and in dispersing them, it ceased to exist, basically and so, in a very, ver technical level, he leaves the buyer blank because he just go the money from the partnership dispersing the money and everything is officially by th book, from the standards o what the disclosure requires and yet, we know nothing about the fact that one of the heads of the biggest law firm bought property from one of the supreme court justices you broke it down reall well, and here s what s goin to surprise most america people is that there is nothin wrong with this because th supreme court is the onl branch of the u.s. governmen and actually stands in contras to many of the higher courts i other western countries, i that there is no enforceable
identified as the owner of thi property here is the problem, chris there s no problem here, technically. there is no violation, no laws were broken, and according t ethics experts, that is th problem, that this doesn t violate anything that you ca have a transaction like this take place with this timing an with someone with such interes before the court and have it b completely opaque. yeah, so that s interesting to me. he didn t own this outright, i was a partnership, and there were some entity created to be the owner of that, that entity then sold it, then dispersed the profits to the people that were part of the partnership and in dispersing them, it ceased to exist, basically and so, in a very, ver technical level, he leaves the buyer blank because he just go the money from the partnership dispersing the money and everything is officially by th book, from the standards o what the disclosure requires and yet, we know nothing about the fact that one of the heads of the biggest law
so all of those top ics are goin to be front and center south korea has provided and slapped sanctions on russia but has not provided any artillery that is among the things that s expected to be under discussion here today as well as we learned about earlier today, that call between president zelenskyy and president xi i spoke to john kirby about that call and he said, look, we are encouraged by the fact there were conversations at the same time, they re not ready to get ahead of any significance that that call may have had in terms of bringing the two sides, russia and ukraine, to the table for peace talks, andrea. victor cha, how is the decision to dock nuclear submarines in south korea as well as this agreement with south korea on any deployment of nukes in a conflict with the north, how is that going to be received in pyongyang and beijing?
i ve always said this these congressman, i don t mak a lot with endorsements, unles what they are doing is recognizing what the base is u to and i think with these congressman leading the voters they are actually following th voters and, of course, in this and it s a demonstration about the stranglehold that donald trump still has on the base of the republican party if you put to center point o where the republican party i today, it is donald trump. and that s the problem that ro desantis has maybe he launches a campaign that is contingent on donald trump following and failin apart and getting put in jai or something maybe that s the contingency but a one-on-one race with trump versus desantis it doesn t look like it s goin to be much of a campaign let me you bring up a lot o interesting points but let me play you get to some of the point that you raised. greg steube and one of his s - about fox news and i ll get your reaction o the other side there s been multiple
integral in getting suprem court justices appointed whe they did they were applauding the appointments of then president donald trump, to the supreme court. knowing and hoping the outcome would be the overturn of, ro which is what they got and now they are calling, th former president s position, o abortion, quote unquote, morally indefensible because h has now said that it should be in the decision of the states. i mean, that s the thing once you go right it s ver hard to go back. and you re seeing look, i mean, trump s only rea challengers s return t sandusky just passed a six-wee abortion ban in a largel purple state we yeah, i, think it s goin to be a problem for them let s talk about th election we are looking at a possible 2024 race. and similar, matchups a, match up, president biden gets far president donald trump possibly ron desantis is not performing the way i think a lot of his