To win that race. The reason that wendy davis is thought to have a better chance than any other democrat in texas is in part because of her national profile. And Wendy Davis National profile was built, largely, on this. These are her awesome pinkish mizuno sneakers, which apparently started selling very, very well in Online Retail sales after wendy davis wore them for 13 hours, while she held court and filibustered in the texas state legislature. The rules in texas for this kind of thing are really strict. Not only can you not sit down and not stop talking, you cant lean on anything. You cant touch your desk which youre standing right next to. Nobody else can touch you. You cannot have anything to eat. You cannot have anything to drink, meaning you cant have a sip of water. But still, senator wendy davis stood there for 13 hours and in so doing, she won. What she did worked. And she wasnt just standing there talking for 13 straight hours, because she had 13 hours of stuff she wanted to
Superior set forth in california law. So, with this third consultant, is rec and park consultant shopping until they find one that will tell them what they want to hear that [speaker not understood] is better, not what the law and the facts dictate, which is that the maintenance alternative is better and will cause less impact on the environment . The open space Contingency Fund is for acquisition of new park space. Its not a slush fund for [speaker not understood] produce a report. Its not a slush fund to pay for a change in gardening at sharp park which is what a lot of the restoration proposed really is. More importantly, the proposed restoration at sharp park is an implementation of plans in the [speaker not understood] before the eir has been complete. We really cant implement whats in the plan before the eir has been finalized and that point should have been made with fish and wildlife. So, im very concerned about the idea of this third consultant and we have a fourth one and [sp
This is the project that don was describing a little bit earlier. The sharp park sharp park is a unique project, a park for the city. Its located in pacifica but [speaker not understood] but is owned by San Francisco. It includes 27 acres of wetlands. You can barely see it in the image above. Thats the entire area of sharp park and the wetlands located to the west of [speaker not understood] in the blue area next to the coast. It also has a number of special status species including the california red legged frog and the San Francisco garter snake. As don mentioned the fish and wildlife has provided us with a biological opinion and that includes 32 mitigation or cultivation measures. One of which is the up land Habitat Restoration. And to comply with the biological opinion, we need to complete that work by october 31st of this year with a short window during the summer months to do work. So we dont have an adverse impact on the special status species. The up land Habitat Restoration wo
Wall street journal article, [speaker not understood], native and nonnative plants would be environmentally superior. There are officials at the citys rec and Park Department that said the report used a no definition of environmentally superior set forth in california law. So, with this third consultant, is rec and park consultant shopping until they find one that will tell them what they want to hear that [speaker not understood] is better, not what the law and the facts dictate, which is that the maintenance alternative is better and will cause less impact on the environment . The open space Contingency Fund is for acquisition of new park space. Its not a slush fund for [speaker not understood] produce a report. Its not a slush fund to pay for a change in gardening at sharp park which is what a lot of the restoration proposed really is. More importantly, the proposed restoration at sharp park is an implementation of plans in the [speaker not understood] before the eir has been comple
Is destroyed to create this replica of a prewhite colonization of the habitat. Because this designation [speaker not understood] as environmentally superior supporters were furious with the draft eir the is this why we now need a third consultant . Is rec and park going from consultant to consultant at great cost until they find one that will [speaker not understood] data similar map maintenance alternative is better . In the august 5th, 2013 we wall street journal article, [speaker not understood], native and nonnative plants would be environmentally superior. There are officials at the citys rec and Park Department that said the report used a no definition of environmentally superior set forth in california law. So, with this third consultant, is rec and park consultant shopping until they find one that will tell them what they want to hear that [speaker not understood] is better, not what the law and the facts dictate, which is that the maintenance alternative is better and will cau