Sir ron dennis, welcome to hardtalk. Thank you for having me. Oh, its a great pleasure to have you here. I have read how you fell in love with motorsport as a teenager. I think you went to brands hatch when you were a teenager and just loved the smells, the sights of it. Do you still have that love of motorsport today . I still enjoy watching a grand prix, but save for that, its really a thing of the past for me. The main reason for me changing direction, i dont even know how to spell retirement, was really the looming of my 70th birthday. And it was a little scrappy at the end, i have to say, primarily driven by disagreement over the value of my shares. But once. In the mclaren group, which you had done so much to create and to build. Well. I like to feel that i pretty much built it. Of course, no one individual builds anything, but, um, when i left the building on my 70th birthday, because that was very symbolic to me. Mm. It was really a full stop in a chapter of my life. I want to
generators of absurd hypotheticals. this is like the dancing girls coming in holding up signs. that is probably the only way to make it interesting. the constitution essentially says it is up to each state s legislature to decide how they are going to run their elections. so, the question now is does that mean they can do whatever they want or can the state courts say that is crazy? what we are going to do is we will get everyone together. and flip a coin. we will have a sprint. democrats, you pick your fastest runner, republicans, you pick your fastest runner. could the state supreme court come in and say no, that s unconstitutional? there is no due process? true adherence, people believe in this theory. say, sure. whatever the legislature wants to do is good to go. the liberal justices and people arguing say no. of course, the governor can
down the pike. here we are, it is now real. we re going to see some movement in the midterms where moderates have been voting republican will come over to the democratic side. this is not a hypothetical call conversation any more. in june the supreme court showed us that they meant what they said, some of the justice that s just got put on to the bench. i think this is good news for the democrats across the board. the tragedy is the political fallout doesn t help women that don t have access to health care right now. i want to ask you about the group of voters. now what we have to accept is truth is that either she liked us or brett kavanaugh liked her. i ll let everyone flip a coin. but then here we are. best piece of evidence we have how those voters, republicans
jerry sandusky s child rape accusations. one from the university s president says dealing with the sex abuse within the school was, quote, humane. it s a cnn exclusive. plus return to power. the political party that ruled mexico for 70 years is back. you re looking at mexico s projected new president, pena nieto. on his agenda reduce the violence from drug cartels that seem to rule the country, but can he do it? a rematch is on or is it? this photo finish was too close to call so these two runners are duking it out tonight fighting for that olympic dream but now reports suggest one of them might not run. newsroom begins right now. and good morning to you. i m carol costello. thank you so much for joining us on this hot monday. we do begin this hour with the brutal heat smothering millions of americans. for many of you, it is downright dangerous. a massive weekend storm toppled power lines from indiana to maryland. this morning nearly 2 million people still have no way
of what we do will be determined not just by the obama administration by what the fears are in congress. it ultimately has the veto power over u.s. aid as well. we ll be close attention to what happens. thank you. rolling right along. welcome back. hour two. the u.s. supreme court strikes down most of arizona s immigration law. both sides are claiming victory today. i want to break it down point by point. there are three major planks in the law. they are out. the first would have allowed police to arrest immigrants without warrant if they had probable cause a crime had been committed. number two a crime not to carry registration papers or i.d. the third that was struck down would have prevented illegal immigrations from trying to get jobs. those provisions are gone. the part of this legislation that still stands is this part. it says police can check a person s immigration status while enforcing other laws if they have reasonable suspicion that this person is in the u.s.