pieces of wood, nails. that s an antipersonnel device. that s used to maim or kill. for almost two decades, he skillfully evaded identification and capture. we had literally hundreds and hundreds of suspects. he dropped out of sight for six years. people thought he was dead. he was obsessed about leaving fingerprint evidence. nobody has seen anybody like theodore kaczynski. the hunt for the unabomber. next. a simple sketch was almost all investigators had to go on. the facial features were distinct, but the head was
there was no such business at that particular address. and still others were meant to mock the fbi. for example, on one of the letters the unabomber sent, the address was 9th and pennsylvania avenue northwest in washington, d.c. which, of course, is the address of the j. edgar hoover fbi building. in one of the letters he said the fbi is a joke. the fbi will not be catching us any time soon. the fbi, of course, had no idea about the unabomber s identity or whereabouts. and ted kaczynski took great pains to make sure he didn t leave a single clue. he would take files and he would file everything down after he built something so that he could ensure that he was getting rid of fingerprints. he was obsessed about leaving fingerprint evidence. kaczynski also planted false clues to throw investigators off the trail. he went to a bathroom at the bus station in missoula,
the philadelphia district attorney asked the court to dismiss the entirety of rollins petition and objected to full dna testing. there are fingernail scrapings. there is biological material from the box in which the victim was found, fingerprint evidence. we can t test it unless the court gives us an order allowing us to do it. if you re a prosecutor with any integrity, you would say, all right. we ll pull all the dna out and test it. let s be sure. and they won t do it. and they won t do it because they don t want to know if they made a mistake. even the fahys told me at the time that they were for dna testing. if there were dna to be tested against, would you of course. sure. now, would he be willing? oh, he insists on it. oh, does he? if for some reason he is not the person who killed barbara jean, well, then, i wouldn t want to
and the evidence compelling. particularly the fingerprint evidence. have the charges read to you. expect to have more charges be brought now that more packages have been found, but he will plead guilty or not. they will figure out where he needs to stay. will he be released? he will not be? he will remain in florida where five of the packages went. they had jurisdiction over that which is very, very well versed in terrorism. they had the chelsea bombings and the embassy bombings and a lot of experience with terrorism happening in the fdny. the procedural-based one figuring out what charges and they will probably expand and whether he will be tried and changed and florida or new york or anywhere else the packages may have arrived or are going to. they are learning more about
whatever you want to say, the bottom line of it is, he s innocent until proven guilty, as to the two pieces of evidence you wrefrnsed, the bottom line of it is, in the criminal complaint there s a footnote in the bottom of it that acknowledges the fingerprint evidence has not been confirmed and it would certainly not be admissible in a court of law at this stage as far as proof of guilt. as to the dna, the word was possible dna connection, we don t know if the possible dna connection was 1 in a million, 1 in 1,000, 1 in 2 people. as far as we re concerned at this stage, that s kind of flimsy evidence. just to drill down on this for a second. we re all innocent until proven guilty, do you believe at this point and i know it s way early your client is going to plead innocent, not guilty? he s going to plead not guilty at this stage, there s no reason for him to plead any