another life after that. two years later, he joined the parade and eventually led the parade to re-election. i don t know if it s in joe biden s d.n.a. to do that, but i do think sometimes when your treasury secretary is saying i did not appreciate it had the severity of the inflation, it s not transitory, and the head of the federal reserve is saying the same thing and others are acknowledging the obvious end then tackle the problem, albeit late, but at least fess up and say it s something you missed. sandra: and larry kudlow was in the chair yesterday and he believes the fed needs to raise rates a full point to clamp down on this. but it could lead to higher unemployment rate and that would mean the working class would have to suffer through fixing the problem more than anybody. it s very tough. and i m so old i remember going through the carter years and the
of cockpit of government and british politics, the damage done to the broader conservative party if right at the outset, borisjohnson and number 10 said, you know what? we did fess up, we did have a bit of a gathering, really, really sorry and i hold my hands up and we should not have done it. everyone, we ve had a word with everybody and we are deeply compliant deeply sorry. ironically, and i never thought i would say these words, gavin williamson sort of played it right. he was in that position as well, he had been caught having a gathering and he said sorry the world moved on. but i m just wondering now perhaps number 10 at that point did know it was not just a one off party. now we see the scale of it, so what they have sought to do is to mislead, then double down and i think this is the problem. then they have gone on the attack to keir starmer. hold on, let s clear up a few things, borisjohnson never knowingly misled the house of commons or indeed anyone else.
i wonder how you assess the governments media strategies and sis began in early december. i think what s really interesting about how the government has handled it is they ve mishandled it right from the beginning. and i m thinking today, why did they do that? because, of course, we wouldn t be here today with all this collateral damage being done to borisjohnson s reputation, the reputation of number 10 as an institution, the cockpit of government as an institution, the cockpit of government and british politics, the damage done to the broader conservative party. if right at the outset borisjohnson in number 10 had said, you know what? we did, fess up, we did have a bit of a gathering, really sorry, i hold my hands up, we shouldn t have done it, we ve had a word with everybody, we are deeply, deeply sorry. ironically, and i never thought these are words which i would utter, gavin williamson sort of played it right because he was in that position as well. he had been caught having a
the cockpit of government and british politics, the damage done to the broader conservative party. if right at the outset borisjohnson in number ten had said, you know what? we did, fess up, we did have a bit of a gathering, really sorry, i hold my hands up, we should have done it, we had a word with everybody, we are deeply, deeply sorry. ironically, and i never thought these are words which i would utter, gavin williamson sort of played it right. because he was in that position as well. he had been caught having a bit of a gathering. he said sorry, the world moved on. but i m just wondering now, perhaps number ten at that point did know that it wasn t a one off party. now we see the scale of it. so what they have sought to do is to mislead then double down. i think this is the problem and then they got on the attack to keir starmer. let s clear up a couple of things, borisjohnson said he never knowingly misled the house of commons indeed anyone else.