they? forso companies have a dilemma, don t they? for so long, companies have a dilemma, don t they? forso long, governments haven t met their spending commitments. did they invest now in the next generations of weapons when they don t know how long the war might last? might last? exactly. first, thanks for havin: might last? exactly. first, thanks for having me- might last? exactly. first, thanks for having me. i might last? exactly. first, thanks for having me. i think might last? exactly. first, thanks for having me. i think they re - for having me. i think they re looking at stuff like many european companies. the concern is that all attention is on ukraine and nato members are talking about reaching the spending target that lots of countries have field to do. the big question is what will happen five or ten years down the line. the general who heads us forces to put together a report. in terms of where its focus will be, how in arms itself, what would you expect to
do need to reflect, president erdogan can t make a decision on his own. he now refers it on to parliament, who has to then pass it. but he has agreed to work with parliament to make sure that does happen. it s interesting when you look at some of these issues that erdogan previously raised things like pkk, a group that he and many of you as a terrorist organisation, saying sweden wasn t doing enough many view. there s issues around things like fighterjets to resume herfinished resume purchase from the us. with the issue ofjoining the us. with the issue ofjoining the eu, it took a separate organisation, was thrown into the mix as well. all those issues feeding into the potential delay in accession, but we don t know the details of how exactly, but it seems sweden will go the way of finland. during those, both countries spoke at the same time. life spoke to the finnish foreign minister, and she told me she always viewed this very much as a joint process. it was sweden a
sa s. the uncapped. that is not what rwanda says. the scheme uncapped. that is not what rwanda says. the scheme is uncapped. that is not what rwanda says. the scheme is uncapped, - uncapped. that is not what rwanda l says. the scheme is uncapped, which is wh i says. the scheme is uncapped, which is why i think says. the scheme is uncapped, which is why i think it says. the scheme is uncapped, which is why i think it will says. the scheme is uncapped, which is why i think it will act says. the scheme is uncapped, which is why i think it will act as says. the scheme is uncapped, which is why i think it will act as a is why i think it will act as a deterrent is why i think it will act as a deterrent when the scheme is up and running deterrent when the scheme is up and runninu. ~ , ., deterrent when the scheme is up and runninu. ~ ,, u, .,, , running. when you came last time you said ou running. when you came last time you said you were running. when you cam