anthony fauci world on a hill and as always, seems a little off. take a look. why was it so important in the waters not have started in the lab? it wasn t so important that the wires we don t know. soon it was important for somebody in the biden administration so much so the top people at meta, facebook are asking why we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? sean: guess what, we have a dr rand paul, senator rand paul, the actual smoking gun e-mails, he put it in his book, doctor fauci avoiding accountability for years while gas citing the macon people every step of the way. that might soon be over. it would check in with rand paul, that is coming up. also denied, illegal immigrants according to this new report, the biden administration simply tossed at 350,000 illegal immigration cases granting impunity to a hundreds of thousands a and better to joe biden illegals without even at trial. also tonight, pro basketball start caitlin clark is that brin
full pledged panic? donald trump is calling on the supreme court to act before his sentencing, otherwise alvin bragg split a coke on job, allow me to slowly work this way, a variety of anuk records filled with partisan judges who hate donald trump. this laufer deserves to be rectified before the election? these questions must be ans answered? did alvin bragg withhold eight exculpatory evidence from the indicting grand jury, was joe biden donor judge marsh on obligated to recuse himself? what about the family conflicts? where donald trump s six amendment rights violated by not telling him the crime that he was even charged with? and if the trial, of even know at this point. did the judge allow prejudicial information during the trial? did new york even have jurisdiction on a federal election law? did the judge violate not one but two supreme court decisions, the latest in 2020, louisiana,
you ever see a case like this in your life? never. of course not. neither has anybody else. i don t stand alone. i ve practised law in york for 15 years. and nobody has ever seen a case like this before. and hopefully nobody ever will again. hopefully they will never again. let s talk a little bit about what your expectations were. i ve gone through the list. you have a biden donor judge in the family conflicts. you have a da that ran on a get trump campaign. mar-a-lago is still i guess valued at $18 million a according to judge her again when it s closer to billion. but more importantly legal theory and then the broad latitude given to the defence and closing arguments to make statements that are factually inaccurate to the jury over and over again. you would object. that would be overruled. and then the judge himself a