case begins tomorrow then from lavish trips to defunct real estate firm the ethics questions surrounding supreme cour justice clarence thomas ar piling up. and growing outrage in kansa city tonight after a 16 year old boy mistakenly went to the wrong door and was shot twice. the suspect now charged with two felony counts, as the 11th hour gets underway on this monday night good evening once again, i a stephanie ruhle. we begin this evening in the state of delaware, where the dominion fox news defamation trial is expected to begin tomorrow the trial was supposed to begi today, but the judge delayed the preceding with n explanation. there were several ports about a potential settlement, the ne york times political reporte who has been all over the case jeremy peters, is skeptica about that dominion is really just saying, okay fine. we will put a good faith effor to ward talking about a deal even if we don t think there i one to be had. but i really do believe that i this coul
defunct real estate firm the ethics questions surrounding supreme cour justice clarence thomas ar piling up. and growing outrage in kansa city tonight after a 16 year old boy mistakenly went to the wrong door and was shot twice. the suspect now charged with two felony counts, as the 11th hour gets underway on this monday night good evening once again, i a stephanie ruhle. we begin this evening in the state of delaware, where the dominion fox news defamation trial is expected to begin tomorrow the trial was supposed to begi today, but the judge delayed the preceding with n explanation. there were several ports about a potential settlement, the ne york times political reporte who has been all over the case jeremy peters, is skeptica about that dominion is really just saying, okay fine. we will put a good faith effor to ward talking about a deal even if we don t think there i one to be had. but i really do believe that i this could have been settled it would have been settled
mean fox news going to its audience and saying what the judge has ruled here already before the case even starts, that these were fals statements, there is really no defense of the falsehood o these. and so both sides are dug in fox also arguing of course tha it was within its rights to do this, and it s going to argu that in front of a jury. that even the first amendmen protects this sort of speech even when it might b incorrect. so it s going to come down t that sort of very technica legal fees glenn, let s talk about the legal pandora s box this could open, because reuters is reporting that some folk shareholders want directors, members of the board, to b liable for the big cost in thi lawsuit. is that a possibility here it s a thing. fox has actually suffered thes kind of derivative lawsuit brought by shareholder previously they are going to go after the board members, the directors
sides have this has set is ful steam ahead toward trial look, anything is possible sure, could there be a settlement, of course. but right now, the plan is tha we are going to go into cour tomorrow morning, the judge is going to finish jury selection and both sides expect that the will get their opening statements, perhaps even a witness or two will take a stand. so it looks like this is moving who hasn t been until now that doesn t want to settle, right? fox could beasts facing a nine figure penalty if they lose. is it dominion as not want t settle dominion has been clear through all that they don want to settle but both sides have been reall dug in, because dominion s key asks are not just this hug monetary settlement that fox i disputing, will dispute here i court for sure but dominion also is insisting on an apology, and not jus once, right? i think they would expect really full apology, that woul mean fox news going to its audience and saying what the judge has ruled here alr