actually asking the tough questions. so i think the president had an opportunity to call this committee out and say, listee p if you say you have this evidence, have a hearing, i ll come down there. my sonhere, we will come down t, will testify that story. but we all know it s all. locked in the back door. are the fbi, they re not touching it, so they ll never thin tg to to that stage where they can have hearings because they can t get their hands on any of the evidence becausee the been sitting there for years and it s very comfortablfe off the you know, on the very. but more than that, we ve moe seenplayou movie play out befor. this happened a couple of years ago when there was this whole thing about, benghazi, hillary clinton went down there and testified fofor 17 hours and nothing came of it. of course it didn t. right. there wa s all these crimes happened. she did all this stuff with the ouys now in our committeurs, ann the truth started to come out and testify. and so my p
school. i don t know what to say about this, except they call it an incident. that s that s all it is , is an incident. how are your clients doing now? in inrighcit. right. high school is difficult enough. i can t imagine what it was like to go through this. but the parents, as you had mentioned, they didn t get an adequate response from the district when they tried to first resolve this on their own and they felt thatt imaginet their concerns weren t being taken seriously. like through this. own.t was when they reached out to us and kind of said , to u, what are my rights and what are my options? thise ultimately sent public letter to hold the district accountable. and these parents, they just want a resolutios? n. i m sure. you know, i can only imagine that these girls probably wish this never happened, but they just want a resolution. they don t want this to happen again. they want to know what the policies are to protect, eys protect girls in the districtt w and ensure their privac
news channel. you re a sitting united states senator who was elected by your entire state and one of your jobs to provide oversight of the pentagon. and if they held thation information from you, they hid y it from you. that like a very big deal . it s a big deal and it s not a first time. look a t how many other timesit s within agencies in n a biden administration, look how they ve used executive orders when they bypass the legislative process. this is clear. if you re going to deploy order troops, that ss a congressionao responsibility. ce from the 73 war powers act. there s so much in this administration that they use the agencies. they can t get it done legislatively. let you force the issue here. tu i think they ve really pushed the envelope. we ve spenit down t so much timr pounding on your republican colleagues in the senate for ignoring this rer stuff. if and then w e learned that you were, i think, rightly incensed by can you give a sense of how many of your fellow
back in 2021, i spoke to a woman who terminated her pregnancy using a misoprosto only regiment that she got fro an ungrateful agent market fro a friend, or someone in th community, the travel to mexic to get that. she was able to successfully terminate her pregnancy, but she had to go back twice - its important to get down t the ground, right, and hea from the people that doe affect a lot i have for us on tha case thank you so much, chloe atkins it s expected to go down tuesday in much the same way i happened last time begin now spent from president biden. former obama press secretary robert gibbs, join me in 6 seconds to talk about that and the one word that could produc to reelection victory. u only pay for what you need. with the money we saved, we tried electric unicycles. i think i ve got it! doggy-paddle! only pay for what you need. liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. weeds. they have you surrounded.
mean fox news going to its audience and saying what the judge has ruled here already before the case even starts, that these were fals statements, there is really no defense of the falsehood o these. and so both sides are dug in fox also arguing of course tha it was within its rights to do this, and it s going to argu that in front of a jury. that even the first amendmen protects this sort of speech even when it might b incorrect. so it s going to come down t that sort of very technica legal fees glenn, let s talk about the legal pandora s box this could open, because reuters is reporting that some folk shareholders want directors, members of the board, to b liable for the big cost in thi lawsuit. is that a possibility here it s a thing. fox has actually suffered thes kind of derivative lawsuit brought by shareholder previously they are going to go after the board members, the directors