Judges to be absolutely bound by the president of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has held in a case that that obligation is absolute. That Circuit Court judges are not permitted for example to anticipate over rulings of the court and jump the gun. Obligated tos are follow Supreme Court precedent. As well, they are bound to follow the precedent of their own circuit according to the circuits doctrine and for example in the seventh circuit, that means that edges follow precedent unless there are extraordinary circumstances that justify its overruling. Crocs lastly, as we just discussed, Circuit Court judges are required to follow all Supreme Court precedent. If confirmed, would you follow precedent regarding abortion . I would, absolutely. Daniel, we wanted to get your reaction to the nomination. I guess i am a little bit broken up about Justice Ginsburg. About abortion, she said she wished it had been done under the protection clause instead of under right to privacy. The right to
Welcome to the october 5, 2020 rules committee. I am hillary ronen, chair of the committee. With me on the phone is rules Committee Member gordon mar, and we will soon be joined by supervisor catherine stefani. Our clerk today is victor young. Mr. Young, do you have any announcements today . Clerk yes. Committee members will attend this meeting through Video Conference and participate in the meeting to the same extent as if they were physically present. Public comment will be available on each item on this agenda. Both channel 26 and sfgovtv. Org are streaming the number across the screen. Comments or opportunities to speak during the Public Comment are available via phone by calling 4156550001. The meeting i. D. Is 1466846771. And then press pound, and pound again. Public comment will be available on each item on the agenda sorry. I just repeated myself. When connected, you will hear the meeting discussions but be muted and in listening mode only. When your item of interest comes up,
President mike pence. Later, an update on the u. S. Response to the coronavirus with a doctor from the Bipartisan Policy Center. Host good morning. It is wednesday, october 7. After announcing yesterday that he was cutting out talks for more Coronavirus Relief until after the election, President Trump appeared to reverse course last night and signaled he would be open to signing specific measures as lawmakers try to get a handle on where negotiations are. Your reaction to the latest relief talks and what you need in your part of the country. You are unemployed or furloughed, the number is 202 7488000. If you are a Small Business owner or employee, 202 7488001. If you are an essential worker, 202 7488002. All others can call in at 7488003. That is also where you can send us a text. If you do, include your name and where youre from. Catch up with us on twitter at cspan w j and on facebook. Com cspan. You can start calling in now as we take you to the president s tender twitter page. Last
Uninterrupted argument and then that would be questioning in order of with meet and then judge laurier. Mr. Constable, you will begin and you have reserved three minutes for rebuttal. Thank you, your honor, and good morning. May it please the court. And may it please the court. On remand the president filed an amendment complaint raising two claims. First, that the subpoena at issue is an overbroad fishing expedition, and second, that it was issued in bad faith in order to arrest the president. The District Attorney concedes that the Supreme Court has authorized the president to bring these claims in federal court. The only issue then on appeal is whether the allegation of bad faith are possible. The District Court termination they are not to be reversed for several reasons. First, the court stack the deck against the president by asserting that these claims are a disguised attempt to relitigate category and 90. As a distant turn it also concedes they cleanly are not. Second, the court
This is an institution that rests on the trust and reverence of the American People. Losing that trust and reverence is dangerous is dangerous. Its dangerous for millions of people who will lose the Affordable Care act protections. Its dangerous for the women who could lose their right to choose and all of us who do not want to turn back a half a century of progress. Its dangerous for our economy at a time when American Workers and consumers find themselves at the mercy of corporations that have grown larger and more powerful than at any other time since the gilded age. Its dangerous for the future of our planet and safety of our climate, at a time when the west is burning, seas are rising, and the earth is warming faster than ever before. And, quite frankly, its dangerous for our democracy. We owe the American People a voice and a decision that will shape the course of history for generations. And we owe the memory of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and her seat on the Supreme Court more than jus