Say that. And did he ask you to pledge loyalty and there would be nothing wrong if i did say it according to everybody that i read today but i did not say that. And did he ask for a pledge of loyalty from you. Thats another thing he said. No, he did not. He said those things under oath. Would you be willing to speak under oath to give your version of events. 100 . I didnt say under oath. I hardly know the man, i didnt say i want you to pledge allegiance. Who would do that . Who would ask someone to pledge allegice under oath . Who would do that. It makes no sense. No, i didnt say that, i didnt say the other. If Robert Mueller wanted to speak to you about that. I would be glad to tell him exactly what i just told you. Seem to be hinteding there are recordings of those conversations. Im not hinteding anything. Ill tell you over a very short period of time. When will you tell us about the recordings. Over a short period of time. Are there take place, sir . You are going to be very
disappo
bernie sanders? i do like that comparison. the actual victor in the election is clearly mr. corbin. he is eye delogically and temperamentally completely opposite to someone like donald trump. what he and trump have in commons is this capacity to present themselves as antiestablishment, anti-status quo. in his policies he s much more like a bernie sanders figure. he shares those kinds of insurgent values. he starked the kind of youth enthusiasm that we saw here. i think there are a lot of comparisons. one of them also, brian, being this. i think increasingly debatable idea that more centrist candidates are axiomatically more electionible. i think that thesis as it applies either in britain or the united states is increasingly questionable these days. want to thank you both.
he is eye delogically and temperamentally completely opposite to someone like donald trump. what he and trump have in commons is this capacity to present themselves as antiestablishment, anti-status quo. in his policies he s much more like a bernie sanders figure. he shares those kinds of insurgent values. he starked the kind of youth enthusiasm that we saw here. i think there are a lot of comparisons. one of them also, brian, being this. i think increasingly debatable idea that more centrist candidates are axiomatically more electionible. i think that thesis as it applies either in britain or the united states is increasingly questionable these days. want to thank you both. while the jet age has shortened
they may disagree eye delogically on some things, jared is a little bit more centrist, but as far as their agenda, advancing the president they are sort of in lock step. what an interesting office and daytime wanter that must be. thank you very much for stopping by to help explain. andrew rice, we appreciate your time tonight. another break for us. coming up, a new low in the polls, and an embarrassing defeat for the president. what s next? some much-needed perspective after two difficult months for the new administration when the 11th hour continues. ok let s call his agent. i m coming over right now.
this race? some talk radio stars clearly don t like eric cantor. i think it played a significant role. i came of age politically and involved in an era when getting out the vote on primary day meant you went door to door with a street list under the direction of a committee person or a ward leader and you asked people to go out and cast a ballot. that function has been completely super planted by the world of talk radio and on the right by fox. that is the gop apparatus now. when you have the likes of mark levin or laura ingran who are banging the drum for the opponent of the eric cantor, it matters. especially when we are talking about 12% coming out on a p prima primary. they are the most eye delogically driven voters. how do you reach them? not with a street list?