well, i don t necessarily think he shuchl i m sure democrats will ask him about that. but just to remind people of the context in which he wrote that. he was trying to separate himself from the starr investigation, which was so controversial in the 1990s. so this was part of that effort. it was also something he realized after serving with george w. bush in the white house for nearly six years. he saw how much the president could be impeded in his daily duties by an investigation. but in that statement, brooke, he is not recommending that it happen unless congress actually pass as law. and it would have to reverse who the super power already said that made bill clinton sub to civil investigation. let me ask you, too, joan, i m a nerd and watched this rbg documentary ahead of time twice and watching how much the supreme court has shifted eye