dump them in another state, so-called sanctuary cities so that they can figure it out. what i just described is exactly the strategy of some republicans governors on the far right of this divide, governors like you see on the screen, governor greg abbott of texas and ron desantis of florida. the latter declaring quote, every community in america should be sharing in the burdens. it shouldn t fall on a handful of red states. the real question is, for many americans out there, do you think desantis is right? we re going to hash that out in moment here. buz was it right for he and abbott to do the following? texas governor sent two buses of asylum seekers to the home of vice president kamala harris. it happened today. and then drove away, left them there. they apparently had no idea where they were or why they were at that particular location, let alone, perhaps, its significance politically speaking. and last night, florida s governor flew two planes with an estimated 50 migran
Thanks to you for not missing this beat. That does it for me. The reidout with joy reid is up next. Tonight on the reidout and if the republicans decide that jim jordan should be the speaker of the house, there will, and by the way, i dont think thats going to happen. I think hell lose, but if they were to decide that, there would no longer be any possible way to argue that a group of elected republicans could be counted on to defend the constitution. Liz cheney speaking the truth about the Republican Leadership crisis. Which an esteemed professor who joins me tonight says should be setting off alarm bells that democracy is in trouble. Even trump is being talked about as a potential speaker. Plus, trumps renewed push to delay, delay, delay, including a heavy dose of whining about being unable to access all of the highly classified documents. That he used to have stashed in his insecure bathroom at maralago. And we begin tonight with the power of eight. Eight republicans, that is. The b
a group that decides whether or not hunter biden actually has abided by those terms. that s the irregularity that she was pointing to. this entire thing was absurd. i want to ask more about this issue of the further investigations in a moment. but, ryan, she also raised the judge, this issue of constitutionality, asking whether the agreement about hunter biden s gun offense was even constitutional. it was a very specific, was this the right article that she could oversee. was she right to raise that concern? absolutely. there does seem to be an irregularity in this agreement. i call it an anomaly. the diversionary program is to set hunter biden up as any defendant would be into something like a rehabilitation program. but if he breaks the conditions for being in that program, then it could trigger a reprosecution, which he could be then sentenced. but that is an executive branch decision. it s a prosecutorial decision. what did the agreement say?
fully. it does for a little bit. but, you know, look, this is not we re not close to a decision on this. but you don t have to show somebody the document in a drug case or fraud case like that. that s number one. you know, the other thing that kind of struck me is that she has now given a member of the judiciary the ability to try to decide what s classified and not classified. that doesn t make any sense to me at all. even with his experience on the fisa court, that is an executive branch decision. and whether he agrees with that decision or not, i m not sure that that is a proper subject for the judiciary. when you think about it, the idea again, i think to the larger point, yes, one could prosecute a case in the grand jury, for example, and talk about the drugs that were seized through witnesses. the thought maybe is that you would be able to talk about what was seized in that inventory without showing the classified documents. he makes a great p point, doug. one of the reas
president to get to work. judge jeanine: why did the president reverse? has been a disaster for the president. has had the two worst weeks since the reelection back in november. they were caught flat footed. the secret service as we learned did not make the decision. this was an executive branch decision and it was nonsense. something that could have easily been paid for through other line items. judge jeanine: tony, you you know politics. we know how it works. what happens is is you take the most positive publicly acclaimed program and pull it out of the budget so everyone comes out and says put it back in, put it back in and then you say give me the money but in this case carney is saying that it was the white house. obama is saying it was the secret service. carney comes out the and says it was the white house. they don t have the cliff notes together? there was obviously a communication gap between the president and the press secretary but this is the whole firefighter fi