judge jeanine: why did the president reverse? has been a disaster for the president. has had the two worst weeks since the reelection back in november. they were caught flat footed. the secret service as we learned did not make the decision. this was an executive branch decision and it was nonsense. something that could have easily been paid for through other line items. judge jeanine: tony, you you know politics. we know how it works. what happens is is you take the most positive publicly acclaimed program and pull it out of the budget so everyone comes out and says put it back in, put it back in and then you say give me the money but in this case carney is saying that it was the white house. obama is saying it was the secret service. carney comes out the and says it was the white house. they don t have the cliff notes together? there was obviously a communication gap between the president and the press secretary but this is the whole firefighter first syndrome. when there is
judge jeanine: why did the president reverse? has been a disaster for the president. has had the two worst weeks since the reelection back in november. they were caught flat footed. the secret service as we learned did not make the decision. this was an executive branch decision and it was nonsense. something that could have easily been paid for through other line items. judge jeanine: tony, you you know politics. we know how it works. what happens is is you take the most positive publicly acclaimed program and pull it out of the budget so everyone comes out and says put it back in, put it back in and then you say give me the money but in this case carney is saying that it was the white house. obama is saying it was the secret service. carney comes out the and says it was the white house. they don t have the cliff notes together? there was obviously a communication gap between the president and the press secretary but this is the whole firefighter first syndrome. when there is
the trials. i think a lot of people would echo the sentiment. they don t want politics involved in this, but there are politics involved. lindsay graham very strong today. i m sure other congressman and women will come out tomorrow saying similar stuff. what could happen politically? could this decision be overturned? i think that s unlikely. the way that the executive branch from the president on down from a policy perspective organized this operation, they organized it with the specific purpose of having this guy in federal court. it s a uniquely executive branch decision. so it s unlikely, there could be a lot of fuss about it. i think in fairness, while i think it s quite right to say there s politics being played, there is a reasonable legal debate to be had about whether or not you treat someone as a civil defendant and accord them constitutional rights they denied their own victims or you treat them as an enemy combatant. i think that s a fair legal
all of the people who were affected that day could go see the trials. i think a lot of people would echo the sentiment. they don t want politics involved in this, but there are politics involved. lindsay graham very strong today. i m sure other congressman and women will come out tomorrow saying similar stuff. what could happen politically? could this decision be overturned? i think that s unlikely. the way that the executive branch from the president on down from a policy perspective organized this operation, they organized it with the specific purpose of having this guy in federal court. it s a uniquely executive branch decision. so it s unlikely, there could be a lot of fuss about it. i think in fairness, while i think it s quite right to say there s politics being played, there is a reasonable legal debate to be had about whether or not you treat someone as a civil defendant and accord them constitutional rights they denied their own victims or you treat them as an enemy combat
today. i m sure other congressman and women will come out tomorrow saying similar stuff. what could happen politically? could this decision be overturned? i think that s unlikely. the way that the executive branch from the president on down from a policy perspective organized this operation, they organized it with the specific purpose of having this guy in federal court. it s a uniquely executive branch decision. so it s unlikely, there could be a lot of fuss about it. i think in fairness, while i think it s quite right to say there s politics being played, there is a reasonable legal debate to be had about whether or not you treat someone as a civil defendant and accord them constitutional rights they denied their own victims or you treat them as an enemy combatant. i think that s a fair legal debate. i agree. they could be both. they could be both combatants and criminals. therefore, you really have a choice whether to treat them as