as well and we expect a fair hearing in this circuit and are optimistic the law will stay in effect. finally, are you pleased that it s been challenged? because you want to set it on the road to the supreme court? that set it on the road to the supreme court? . . set it on the road to the supreme court? ., , ., ., court? at texas right to life we are not afraid of court? at texas right to life we are not afraid of any court? at texas right to life we are not afraid of any of court? at texas right to life we are not afraid of any of our court? at texas right to life we are not afraid of any of our laws - court? at texas right to life we are not afraid of any of our laws going | not afraid of any of our laws going to the legal process and the supreme court already has a strong abortion case that they will be discussing in december and that is going to reach their areas before the heartbeat act and they will have a decision before the heartbeat act and so we will see what happen
pittman s ruling was? his ruling a is a very significant pittman s ruling was? his ruling a is a very significant and pittman s ruling was? his ruling a is a very significant and the - is a very significant and the department ofjustice lawsuit is a watershed moment in the fight for abortion access. we have never seen anything like it before from the department ofjustice and we are thrilled they got involved and we are thrilled that their preliminary injunction. the department of justice needed to get involved because the laws have been so extreme that has caused devastation in texas in terms of access to abortion. and the law was designed to evadejudicial review abortion. and the law was designed to evade judicial review which it has up until this moment. you ust heard what has up until this moment. you ust heard what rebecca i has up until this moment. you ust heard what rebecca said, i has up until this moment. you ust heard what rebecca said, that h has up until this momen
which stems from a case brought by the biden administration, will for the time being prevent the state from enforcing the law, while litigation continues. in hisjudgment, the us districtjudge robert pitman pulled no punches. he said the bill keeps women from exercising control over their lives in ways that are protected by the constitution. that other courts may find a way to avoid this conclusion is theirs to decide. this court will not sanction one more day of this offensive deprivation of such an important right. officials in texas immediately appealed the ruling. the fifth circuit of the appeals court in texas is notoriously conservative. we are going to both sides of this argument. let s start with the pro life side of the debate. rebecca parma is senior legislative associate with texas right to life in austin. thank you for being with us. tell us where are we right now in texas? if you wanted an abortion, could you need go and get one? yes.
you wanted an abortion, could you need go and get one? you wanted an abortion, could you need go and get one? yes. thank you for havin: need go and get one? yes. thank you for having me- need go and get one? yes. thank you for having me. with need go and get one? yes. thank you for having me. with judge need go and get one? yes. thank you for having me. with judge pittman s l for having me. withjudge pittman s ruling from last night things are at it up in the air. so the texas heartbeat act is temporary and joint because of his ruling and so what that means is the abortion industry could resume connecting abortions after the heartbeat is detectable but there is a provision in the act that even under an enjoyment like judge pittman gave him his ruling if an abortion is committed illegally after the heartbeat is detectable and that enjoyment is dissolved which we anticipate it will be those abortions could be held liable and there is a four year statute of limitations so it s dice