pittman's ruling was? his ruling a is a very significant _ pittman's ruling was? his ruling a is a very significant and _ pittman's ruling was? his ruling a is a very significant and the - is a very significant and the department ofjustice lawsuit is a watershed moment in the fight for abortion access. we have never seen anything like it before from the department ofjustice and we are thrilled they got involved and we are thrilled that their preliminary injunction. the department of justice needed to get involved because the laws have been so extreme that has caused devastation in texas in terms of access to abortion. and the law was designed to evadejudicial review abortion. and the law was designed to evade judicial review which it has up until this moment. you 'ust heard what — has up until this moment. you 'ust heard what rebecca i has up until this moment. you 'ust heard what rebecca said, i has up until this moment. you 'ust heard what rebecca said, that h has up until this moment. you just i heard what rebecca said, that people could be prosecuted retrospectively and it's almost a foregone conclusion that the fifth circuit which is a conservative will set his judgment aside? tram which is a conservative will set his judgment aside?— which is a conservative will set his judgment aside? two things on that first, art judgment aside? two things on that first, part of — judgment aside? two things on that first, part of the _ judgment aside? two things on that first, part of the very _ judgment aside? two things on that first, part of the very crucial- first, part of the very crucial aspects is that the retroactive provision which is designed just as you heard to intimidate and threaten abortion providers that even if they are acting fully within the law they