0 and teacher death mystery for nancy grace investigation streaming now on fox station. i know i said goodbye already but i miss you so i m backo again to say goodbye for the second time. t. that s going to be it for us here tonight. tucker will be back ontue monda. tunene in to watch his reaction to this week s insane news at, eight p.m. eastern. hehe will haveig a lot to say. thank you so much. have a great night. and welcome this friday night to hannity. tonight, the deep state, y the democratic party, the media mob, they are once againrece teaming up to promote yet a brand new conspiracy theory. this time the hysteria might b be worse than ever. make the rnc fan favorites. they are now suggesting that donald trump should be executedt ,can t make it up. also tonight, remember john paul, mac, isaac, the computer repairman. he s going to join us now. he turned over biden s laptop to the fbi. and according to him, he now is telling us that he waste threatened by agents to stay quiet.
the white house counsel, goes to the justice department. there s a whole other set of laws he has to comply with, including the privacy act, for instance, that before a document becomes declassified. the second thing i would point out is, you know, the statutes here that are in play, especially the espionage statute, it appears the prosecutors are using a statute with the purpose to evade and to get around that issue, which we know the former president is going to use as his defense. he s going to say, i declassified this stuff, and it doesn t matter. and i think it s important for people to know that it appears this is where this is going. this is going to be a legal fight, and it s far from over. that s a good point indeed. you know, daniel goldman, even if these documents were declassified by then president trump before leaving office, would that have had an impact on the specific statutes being investigated here, based on this report that the court in florida just released? yea
program documents. but the fact that he was apparently in possession of those documents with some intent to disseminate them against the united states or for a foreign country is quite shocking. i m interesting to get jennifer rogers thoughts. the inclusion of the espionage statute indicates potential harm, obviously, to u.s. national security interests. this is a very, very big deal, as i can personally testify, having covered the intelligence community over many years. it is, and i actually think that the obstruction statute is a big deal, too. i did not expect to see that because that requires destruction or mutilation in order to interfere with an investigation or programs of the u.s. so the fact that they think he was up to that and a judge agreed that there s at least probable cause to think so i think is important, too, but you re right, wolf. the espionage act really, really tells us where we are. there was a chance the doj could have just checked the box that
american people understand context, understand precedent. we re told these things going on today a have never happened before. the things going on today that have never happened before as far as i m concerned involves a lot of what s taken place at the fbi. john solomon of the hill just reported just a few days ago that testimony provided to congress behind closed doors by the general counsel of the fbi, who s now under investigation himself, he said right up to the last moment he believed hundt should be charged hillary clinton should be charged with felony violations of the espionage act and that it wasn t until the last moment he was convinced that they didn t have enoughgh proof to demonstrate se had intent, specific intent. now,tr that s an interesting point, because the statute doesn t talk about specific intent. this espionage statute has been around over a hundred years. itro talks about gross negligen,
you prosecuted the blind shake, first world trade center bombing. yes, sean, not only that, a lot of the people players in this i know them for 20 or 30 years. a lot of it is unpleasant. sean: is the same people, would you first of all agree that hillary frankly it was rigged, committed felonies, do you have any doubt about that? no, i don t. i thought it was rigged from the beginning. i think that once president obama in particular laid out what i think is a contorted construction of the espionage statute, which is what they investigated her under, that was, i mean, look at the fact that they investigated trump for conveying signals with respect to flynn on that theory. you know, what obama did was basically say he didn t want mrs.�clinton prosecuted and he laid out a theory of the espionage act that i don t think