Press, former chairman Richard Greene never agreed to the vote and former chairman leavitt rarely took the matter to a vote unless there was a 50 vote. Are there any areas you can work on with the other two commissioners to reach a unanimous decision and if so give us some examples. We certainly strive for consensus. We know everything is not unanimous. I havent figure verified it but 65 of those a unanimous but obviously it is still a percentage that has not been unanimous. I discussed with you, mister chairman and senator brown and other members of the committee as well, one thing i found as chairman, striving for that consensus, unanimity on our rulemaking, so many mandated rulemakings have been particularly the doddfrank act which the controversy was adopted continued into the implementation of those rules that we end up with an extra challenge reaching consensus because of that. In 2013 you post a comment, study on Asset Management in the office of Financial Research requested thi
Homeland Security Committee ranking democrat congressman thompson of mississippi will discuss threats to the u. S. Homeland in light of sundays mass shooting in orlando, florida. And then congressman wittman on u. S. Efforts to combat isis overseas and whether the military is prepared should the current tactics be changed. And California Democratic representative jackie spear will discuss the latest on the mass shooting and what lawmakers learned from tuesdays closed door briefing with National Security officials. Be sure to watch cspans washington journal beginning live 7 00 a. M. Eastern wednesday morning. Join the discussion. Securities Exchange Commission chair Mary Jo White testified at an oversight hearing and was asked about the effectiveness of corporate disclosures and wall street regulations. Senator Richard Shelby chairs the Senate Banking committee. This morning, we will receive testimony from Securities Exchange chair Mary Jo White. Oversight of the commissions an importan
Willing, at least initially, until they find out theyre in a trap and become literally enslaved. Are you aware of Victim Services program that are particularly useful in dealing with the victim cooperation . Is there any social science, any experience out there that would help us do a better job of getting cooperation from the victims of trafficking . Well, of the 15 programs that we looked at, those grant programs, we also conducted sight visits to various places within the u. S. We talked to a number of Victim Service providers, as well as a number of Law Enforcement officials. They told us that while victims cooperation can be difficult, part of the reason its difficult because the victim fears talking to the Police Officer or to the Law Enforcement official but fear retaliation by the trafficker. In some cases, you could have a case where its not just the victim. Its not just the person that is being trafficked, but the trafficker might actually have someone from their family, for
Agency tasked with protecting investors, maintaining fair, orderly, and efficient markets and facilitating Capital Formation. The s. E. C. Is responsible for ensuring transparency so that investors have adequate information to make Investment Decisions and to mitigate conflicts of interest, fraud, and manipulation. This regulatory paradigm is one reason why our Capital Markets have long been the envy of the world and the lifeblood of our economy. Excesses and unnecessary regulation, however, may endanger americas status as the worlds preferred financial center. First and foremost, i believe the s. E. C. Should focus on its core mission. This has become more difficult as the commission has come under increased pressure to expand its mission and cater to special interests. Examples of such efforts include attempts to force the s. E. C. To mandate disclosure on Climate Change and political contributions. These efforts are not new and the s. E. C. Has withstood political pressure in the pa
Sfwloosh we love having you here. We like fireworks. Im not promising were going to have any today. You have just written a new afterward. As i read that which is really a history of where weve come since the book came out about a year ago, i sense that you seem a little more agitated a little more disturbed, a little more angry. Is that fair . No i dont think i feel more angry. I feel you know i feel like ive seen this movie before. The response to the book was very similar to the response to money ball, i had this main character who was a disrupter in his industry who was holding up a mirror in the industry and the picture that he revealed wasnt flattering. There was a lot of anger in response to the book. Thats naturally agitating. You cant really thats true. It is agitating to me in the middle of a firestorm, but i basically have been pleased with how the book has been received. I mean i like to the extent its been read as opposed to been just a totem for controversy, people have s