And the appeal is denied. And this concludes the hearing. President lazarus we are adjourned, and we will see everybody in three weeks. Good morning, the meeting will come to order. Welcome to the thursday october 1 meeting of the government audit and oversight committee. Supervisor gordon mar, im the chair of this committee, and im joined by vicechair, supervisor aaron peskin and supervisor matt haney. Thank you to the clerk, john carroll, and id like to thank sfgovtv for staffing this meeting. Mr. Clerk, do you have any an announcements . Clerk in order to protect the public, Board Members and the City Employees during the covid19 health emergency, the legislative chamber and the Committee Room are closed. This is taken pursuant to all local, state and federal orders and declarations and directives. The Committee Members are attending through Video Conference and will participate to the same extent as if physically present. Public comment is available for each item on the agenda. San
The u. K. In lockdown. Boris johnson ordering sweeping measures to stop people leaving home while President Trump holds off saying the u. S. Is not built to be shut down. And germany stands ready to help italy get through the pandemic. Slow as wuhanilan is ready to lift its lockdown entirely. Just under an hour away from cash equity trading. Let us take a look first at futures. We are seeing gains after asian markets rose. Ftse and dax futures each up more than 4 . We are also seeing gains in u. S. Futures. After drops there as well yesterday, we see green arrows of across the dow and the s p as well as the nasdaq. More than 4 are the futures gains there as well. Visit with Mark Cranfield. Watch walk us through the fed measures. Mark some people are calling it an alphabet soup of measures. They are doing everything from commercial paper through treasury bonds. Every part of the yield curve. All different kinds of assets. Anything with an interest rate. They are going down as far as try
Actually made a number of attempts with the owner, and many are around my dining room table to come to resolve around with that Expansion Plan will look like and the short of it is that we have agreed to disagree on the third story, primarily. That is our number one sticking point. The attached discretionary review this was an eye sore and was built way before the guidelines were put into place and it creates more and doubles the current size of the home and it clearly impacts the rear yard to the space and i think that we are going to expand a little bit more on the way that the back yards are shaped due to that rock ledge that is behind our property that actually impacts and the second thing is that we will address the shadow study and some of which is done in the sponsors architectural plan that you have and that shadow study was actually the month that is captured is during the foggy month and that helps the magnet for fog and so the sunnyist month are not the ones that were captur
Property that would suggest the preparation for further expansion and the last point that i want to make in that is that the issue of this not being a house that is desired for development is that in some of the other cases where the owner has developed the properties and the exact same story was told to those neighbors about the intentions of the use of the expanded homes that they were told. That is a few quick arc facts. So this is what it looks like and you can see that all of the houses are homogonous and the yellow is what the proposed addition looks like and you can see that behind that the other eye sore was just the box that was put on top of the house before the guidelines. And i am out of town, thank you. Second dr requestor . You it will be 22 feet from the closed edition. This view is the vertical wall actually cuts in to the north and further federal or state to the north. The useable property in the rear is considerably smaller. This shows the vertical wall of the existi
And that has been verified by the departments review. And another concern is regarding the houses and after the additional houses to the garage. Currently that means that the purpose of the addition is also to make the current house into a family sized house with four bedrooms. And that is part of the it is not really again, prohibited by the residential design guidelines. The reason that the Department Recommends the approval, the project you have to be on the south side of the rear addition which is only three feet but the resident and the design team requested five feet instead and this was found by the project sponsor after the notice had expired and the reasons by according to the sponsor is to make those a little and a more spacious for for instance the furniture layout purposes. And at this, for these change the department does not agree and because the residents and the guidelines still require in this situation the ad dish to studying the five feet on either side, even the sou