Since the last oral argument in this case the committee referred to the house of representatives, the house of representatives approved two articles of impeachment. Neither of those articles arise out of the events investigated by the special counsel nor the events described in the report of the special counsel land we are here today facing a different claim by the committee, for some political reasons pages 13 to 17 of the supplements a brief their argument is they need the grand jury information to prove in a senate trial on the articles of impeachment approved by the house, the president s culpability for those high crimes and misdemeanors. There are a couple problems with that. The first is that is not what the court found in this case. The court knows we have significant concerns, we dont think she applied to test at all but put that aside. What the District Court found was the house of representatives was acting preliminary to a Senate Impeachment trial on misconduct in the Muell
About she didnt know she said that she was going to try and find out more but she had wanted give me a heads up in fact i think she may even have been instructed to give me a heads up on that. So i asked are going to have what is the next step here. So she said she would try to find out more as you try to call by midnight. Around 1 oclock in the morning. She called me again and she said that. There are concerns up the street and said i needed to get on the call it come home immediately get on the next plane. To the u s. And i asked her why. And she said she wasnt sure but there were concerns about my security astor my physical security because sometimes washington knows more than we do about these things and she said no she hadnt gotten that impression that it was a physical. Security issue, but they were concerned about my security and i needed to come home. Right away. This is extremely irregular and no reason given. But in the to get on the next plane. You said you there were concer